Hello John and Doves,

 

re:  "Institutional Review Board Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consent for Minimal Risk Clinical Investigations."  12/21/2023  The FDA has amended the "21st Century Cures Act" (Cures Act) that now "allows an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than minimal risk to the human subject..."

 

Under this amended rule, an institutional review board (IRB) is permitted to "waive or alter informed consent elements or to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent, under limited conditions, for certain FDA-regulated minimal risk clinical investigations."

 

How do they know these are 'minimal risk' if they haven't tested them??

 

When the Covid-19 mRNA "vaccine" first came out, the FDA said that since they have approved their mRNA "vaccine" technology on the public, any further mRNA "vaccines" won't need "clinical trials" because Covid-19 mRNA "vaccines" were found to be "safe and effective".  The mRNA part will be all that is tweaked to match the new pathogen.  And now, they won't need informed consent because this technology has been shown to be "safe and effective" or it "poses no more than minimal risk to the human subject."

 

So Informed consent will not be needed for anything now - if they deem it "minimal risk".

 

So, the FDA is waving informed consent for clinical testing on human subjects.  They can literally say any clinical investigation "poses no more than minimal risk to the human subject".  They could say this about any new "vaccines", any new drugs...and test these on Americans with NO informed consent.

 

This is what they did with the Covid-19 "vaccine" - there was NO informed consent.  Even pharmacists noted the usual papers that come in the boxes with drugs and vaccines were BLANK with the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine bottles so they were unable to report on side effects, adverse events, etc when they offered this "vaccine" - they had no way to tell Americans anything from the manufacturers - so how could anyone give informed consent??  It was impossible.
Federal Register :: Institutional Review Board Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consent for Minimal Risk Clinical Investigations

This goes along with my other Doves letter about Porton Down - where hundreds of servicemen thought they were volunteering for trials to treat 'the common cold' not chemical experimentation.
U.K. Porton Down New Vaccine Unit to Tackle 'Disease X'

 

St. Louis and other cities in the 1950s and 1960s were involved in ultra secret military experimentation.  In Texas airplanes were used to drop the chemicals.   In St. Louis chemical sprayers were placed on buildings and station wagons.  "City officials were kept in the dark about the tests." The cover story was 'the Army was testing smoke screens to protect cities from a  Russian attack."  The study was to measure the affect of a certain chemical on the lungs.  The Army said the chemicals were safe.  Reports say otherwise.  And no long term studies were done by the Army as follow-up.
Think the U.S. Government Would Never Secrety Experiment on Us?

run time 4:30

 

As I wrote in my above letter On Porton Down, governments see their 'research' more valuable than their citizens - who are unknowing participants in experimentation.  We are fodder and bottom feeders to them.  Depopulation is their agenda.

 

Add this to my letter "Disease X Act of 2023"
"Disease Act of 2023" Bills in the House and Senate and Disease X Bioweapon

 

Is there a Disease X "vaccine" coming?  If there is - informed consent will again be waived.

 

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!

 

Maranatha!

 

Chance.