Hello Donna Danna, John
and Doves,
To add to the discussion
of the "1290" days: There has been much written
commentary. Ranging from this was fulfilled with
'Antiochus IV Epiphanes and his stopping the sacrifices and
abomination in the Temple' to 'Emperor Adrian and his temple
to Jupiter' to '70 AD and the destruction of the Second
Temple' to the 'AC in the Tribulation period" - yet
future. So thoughts range from a historical
fulfillment of this verse to it's still future.
For example, this is a
popular interpretation, as Daniel wrote quite a bit of
prophecy about Antiochus IV Epiphanes - and he is in the
historical record:
Daniel 12:11 was already
fulfilled with Antiochus IV Epiphanes. He ended the
daily sacrifice and defiled the altar and
Temple.
There are some
theologians who believe this. "..that the passage
refers exclusively to Antiochus Epiphanes...Antiochus took
away the daily sacrifice as is here declared. This was
in the latter part of May, 168 b.c. Profane history
does not indeed give the day, but it designates the year and
the season. As we have already seen, about three and a
half years elapsed, after the temple worship was entirely
broken up, before Judas Maccabeus expurgated the temple and
restores its rites. The terminus ad quem is not
mentioned in the verse now before us; but still is plainly
implied. The end of the 1290 days must, of course, be
marked by some signal event, just as the commencement of
them is so marked. And as the suppression of the
temple rites constitutes the definitive mark of the
commencement, so it would seem plain that the restoration of
the same rites must mark the conclusion of the period which
is designated."
As I wrote at the
beginning there has been much debate about the "1290
days". I know Daniel wrote extensively about Antiochus
and what he did and what happened concerning his rule.
Daniel wrote about that 'historical' time period and others
and he also wrote about the 70 Weeks decreed - only part of
that is future...as there is a 'time of the Gentiles' that
divides it.
I don't know if 1290
days is a done deal prophecy or not. There is that
possibility. There is no '1290 day' period mentioned
in The Revelation (or for its Tribulation period).
That could mean it is not related to a future time period.
Thank you for your well
thought out reply Donna.
I hadn't realized there
were so many different views of this verse.
Blessings!
Chance