Gino (3 Sep 2017)
"I had to respond"


I had responded to an article that someone had sent me.

Then I forwarded that response to the Pastor that I had while I lived on St. Croix.

He knew that I had spent some years working in the communist USSR, and that later I went to Ukraine after the fall of Communism.

This is what I had sent to him:


Pastor,

            Someone had sent me an article bemoaning the removal of Confederate statues, perhaps thinking that I would bemoan also.

However, I had to respond, hoping to bring a different perspective to them.

Below is my response:


It took a bloody civil war to end slavery in America, but then for a full century afterwards, there were still Jim Crow laws. Why? I think that even after a civil war, America still refused to repent. In a similar fashion, no matter what happened to Israel and Judah, Jerusalem and her kings seemed unwilling to repent of their high places. America, comparatively it seems, refused to acknowledge to the LORD that collectively, we had hatred in our hearts for the black man. When I started working in Chicago, had the government not forced that company into hiring quotas, they never would have hired black men and women for anything but the lowliest positions. I know that from what I had heard those company leaders say, and then when I beheld their attitude towards those that they hired after that, and this was back in the early 70's.

Today, what has made things worse, was not the actions of a few iconoclastic protestors, but the reaction of so many Americans to those iconoclastic protestors. We Americans celebrated when the Iraqis pulled down that graven image of Saddam Hussein. That image represented the tyranny and hatred that the Iraqi people had suffered under that evil regime.

Similarly, nearly thirty years after the fall of communism, people are continuing to tear down the remaining graven images of Lenin, and the West rightfully celebrates with them. Some wonder why after nearly thirty years they would want to tear them down now. The time passed is not the issue at all. The very existence of graven images of Lenin screams to the people that there are still those in the government that long to subjugate them again, with another brutal regime, that there exists those that still hate the common man. That thought, that there are still people that hate them that much, who dreamily look on those graven images of Lenin with some sense of nostalgia, is unacceptable. Those graven images of Lenin still need to come down, even after all these years. They are glaring symbols of an ongoing hatred, so it is not good for his images to remain. They hastily had taken down Stalin's images, so it is equally fitting that they also take down the remainder of Lenin's images. When the average people see communist extremists trying to stop the pulling down of Lenin's images, and they hear them spout their hatred and their  nostalgia for the good old days of communism, that's what really troubles those Russian, or Ukrainian, people. It is the attitude of the others over the removal of those symbols of the bad old days, which troubles them.

It may even be a very similar experience for the average black family, today, to behold the attitude of so many Americans over even the talk of removing symbols of the bad old days of our country.