Gerry Almond (5 Sep 2013)
"Assault on the
nation-state...an explanation"
Dear Christian brothers and sisters:
I am posting this, not that it is anything new, but that it
explains simply the situation we as Americans find nation in
danger of today. May God have mercy on us and deliver us
speedily from this wicked and degenerate generation.
In an article by Alan W. Dowd entitled “Assault on the
Nation-State”, Mr. Dowd noted the major problem of the so-called
“globalists”. Quoting from his incisive article published
in the American Legion Magazine, I call your attention to the
following words of Mr. Dowd:
“For the better part of 400 years, the nation-state system has
served to organize the world. But today, this global order
is under assault from four divergent movements:
post-nationalism (think globalization), supranationalism (think
International Criminal Court) transnationalism (think al-Qaida),
and non-nationalism (think failed states). Given that the
U. S. is the most powerful nation-state (that has ever been in
the history of the world), these movements are at odds with
American interests”.
The greatest danger America faces today is the incessant
movement toward globalization. For right now, that is for
the moment, the United States is in the mode of resistance.
POST-NATIONALISM
This, of course, assumes no nation-state. That would
mean that our sovereignty has been ceded to a world order of
some sort. The pressure is great and mounting for that
very thing to happen. So far, it has not succeeded, but
there are those pushing for it anyway, both internally and
externally.
SUPRANATIONALISM
Again, quoting from Dowd’s article: “If transnationalism
erodes a nation-state system from below, supranationalism
whittles it away from above. Both seek a stateless world,
although their visions for what such would look like are
dramatically different.”
“Examples of supranationalism are organizations like the United
Nations, International Criminal Court, or the European Union.”
Our own former Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld worried
about this and he warned that “it gives states an excuse to take
the easy way out by punting problems to these bodies instead of
taking responsibility for them”. We see this happening
frequently now with many of the nations, including our own
country. The U. N. has become an excuse not to act in places
where perhaps military or economic action is required. The
U. N. thus becomes a hindrance to problem solution, instead of a
solution because of the veto power of sovereign states using it
for their own interests to the harm of other nations. Mr.
Dowd cites the following example:
“The International Criminal Court is an example of “lawfare”,
using legal means to constrain the political independence of
nation-states. The ICC…..has conducted investigations
‘into whether NATO troops, including American soldiers, fighting
the Taliban may have to be put in dock.’ The ICC has no
authority to take such action against the U. S. since the U. S.
is not party to the treaty, but that’s not stopping ICC lawyers
from lunging at U. S. sovereignty”.
The United Nations took eight weeks in 2003 to approve a
resolution requiring Sadaam Hussein’s Iraq to comply with
existing resolutions made by the U. N.
And sadly, in 2010 North Korea torpedoed a South Korean ship in
international waters, killing 46 sailors. All the U. N.
did was to publish a report condemning the attack without
condemning the attacker, let alone punish them, Dowd
reports. “Yet, while the U. N. fails to hold agressors
responsible for their misconduct, U. N. affiliated bodies such
as the ICC impugn and investigate the U. S. for trying to uphold
the international system”.
Another glaring example is the nuclear testing of atomic bombs
by North Korea. These tests are illegal and demand U. N.
sanctions. Nothing yet has been done to make it painful
for North Korea to continue such illegal and dangerous activity.
TRANSNATIONALISM
Examples of Transnationalism are groups such as al-Qaida and
other terrorist organizations operating in the world.
These have an objective: to erode the nation-state from
below, instead of above. These have as their goal,
according to Rumsfeld (quoted again) “to end the state system
using terrorism, to drive the non-radicals from the world”.
This dangerous world movement, mostly at this time Islamic
jihadists, but also including some others is a very present and
real danger to the world system of nation-states. These
adherents stop at nothing including genocide, and will use
whatever means to achieve their goal. These adherents are
brute-beasts, killing without mercy any in their path.
Names like Taliban, al-Qaida, Hamas, etc bring these to life in
our present world. The entire middle east is a hot bed of
activity.
POSTNATIONALISM
This envisions a world after or beyond the nation-state.
This would do away with all sovereignty and lump the world into
one basket. A one-world system as it is called in the
Bible. It is envisioned to be a highly integrated system
of rulership as compared to governance, and finally, for the
first time, it is possible because of highly advanced computer
and scientific technology. Greed among the nation-states
is helping tremendously to advance this dream of the New World
Order people.
Dowd comments to the reader that the world thinkers and elite
planners right now (think bankers, socialists, etc) see this as
a world eventually devolved to megacities, nongovernmental
organizations and multinational companies. Businesses as
we know them now could not operate successfully in such an
atmosphere. It seems that thinkers and planners today
accept globalization as “good”, that is until it infringes on
their own sovereignty or threatens their own security. U.
S. President Harry Truman, Dowd wrote, “like many Americans,
would probably conclude that globalization is good (as it lowers
transactional costs) until it infringes on American sovereignty
or threatens American security. It pays to recall that our
enemies are exploiting the promise of a borderless world in
order to attack the present world. Consider what is
happening in cyberspace, or what happened on 9/11/2001when the
twin (financial) towers were downed. Post-nationalists
ignore these downsides of globalization”. They do so in
their own self interest, largely driven by greed.
Up until the election of our present administration, the U. S.
has resisted these movements against it throughout its entire
history.
Since the United States of America came of age in a centuries
old system of global order (instead of dis-order), the question
now is can it keep that order from falling apart? Does it
have the will to?
Only God, in His great mercy, can control a world so hell-bent
on its own destruction. It is time, I believe, for God to
once again intervene in the affairs of men and His word says
that He will in the form of rapture/judgment of a system that is
heinously wicked.
My own observation is that the rapture event/sudden destruction
will force the world to reform into a one world system and post
nationalism will be realized.
Maranatha
Gerry Almond