Gino (20 Oct 2024)
"RE: Nansings: 06.13.24: victim"


A very strange thing has come about with all this.
Initially, Fay brought up her understanding, that the women in Genesis 6 were victims.
Then I proposed that maybe the women were willing participants.
Then, in your letter, the women appear to be the perpetrators.
These three are very different from one another.

A similar change of view has been going on in the US.
For a long time, women were given the benefit of the doubt, and were generally believed to be victims in crimes like these.

By the turn of the recent century, the claims of women were considered only very suspiciously.
Progressive views began to consider that the claims of the women were possibly afterthoughts.
The women were considered to have probably been willing, at least initially.
So, unless there were eye witnesses, or CCTV footage, nothing further comes of it, and the woman's reputation is tarnished.

Now, there are areas of the country, where the view is completely changing, in particular where there is muslim influence, e.g. Michigan, Minnesota, etc.
Where, if a crime like this happens, the woman is automatically considered the seductress, and the man the victim.

This is a strange parallel, to say the least.

.