CONSIDER THIS FOR ONLY THINKING CHRISTIANS ......

Daniel , the prophet,  did not write the Book of Daniel according to the Rules of English Composition because the Rules of English Composition had not even  been thought of at the time of Daniel's writing. In fact, none of the Bible was written according to the Rules of English Composition, therefore the argument  of holding the reference to a 'particular pronoun' back to the 'preceding noun' is 'out the window' . Therefore, one must read the Scriptures in a "conceptual" or a "contextual" way.

 

For example, the word "Messiah" is spoken of ONLY TWICE in all of the Scriptures. BOTH TIMES in  the Book of Daniel, and BOTH TIMES in Chapter 9. The FIRST TIME in Daniel 9:25 , and the SECOND TIME in Daniel 9:26.  NOW AS THE INTELLIGENT PERSON THAT YOU ARE, DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT THE PRONOUN "HE" IN Daniel 9:27 is, all of a sudden, speaking of the anti-Christ instead of the Messiah WHO WAS JUST SPOKEN OF IN THE PRECEDING TWO VERSES of Daniel 9:25 and Daniel 9:26 ??  REALLY ? THINK ABOUT IT !  OF COURSE NOT !

SO, THERE YOU HAVE IT:

The entire Chapter 9 of the Book of Daniel is devoted to the relationship between  the Hebrew people and their Messiah. NOWHERE in Chapter 9, of the Book of Daniel, is the anti-Christ spoken of in any way whatsoever. This holds true  for THE CONTINUITY OF THE LAST THREE VERSES  of Daniel 9:25-27 which are ALL THREE ABOUT THE MESSIAH !!!  The "Prince that shall come", spoken of in Daniel 9:26 , is speaking of the prophecy of the Roman Prince, Titus, and his Roman Army that did come in 70 AD to destroy Jerusalem. 

According to Your Holy Word,  come Lord Jesus  !