John,Your new video and your prior research concerning the number 666 is amazing and I can only believe God inspired.It would seem to me that you have numerically and biblically proven with very little or no doubt that the number 666 is directly affiliated with Barack Obama........ and I would totally agree with your conclusion.But.........It is my understanding that you believe that that makes Obama the antichrist. And that's where I disagree with you and will endeavor below to explain why.Through all your research I know that you have been amazed and totally blown away with God's mathematical precision that you have found throughout the bible and what others have found in the exacting mathematical order of the universe and everything in it. God is mathematically precise and exacting in everything He does. He (if you will) double dots the i's and double crosses the t's to insure His creation and everything in it is "orderly."That said.... when God gave us chapter 13 of the Book of Revelation that describes the first and second beasts that we call the antichrist and the false prophet.........He did it in a mathematically exacting and orderly manor. He did not jumble or blend the verses. What do I mean by that?In Revelation chapter 13 God exactly (mathematically) dedicated 8 verses to the first beast....the antichrist. And He exactly dedicated 8 verses to the second beast.....the false prophet.Verses 1-8, eight verses describe the first beast the antichrist.Verses 11-18, eight verses describe the second beast the false prophet.So, to insure that no one would be confused with His descriptions of these two beasts, God separated these two descriptions by two verses 9 and 10 that do not flow with verses 1-8 or 11-18. I believe that God inserted these two irrelevant verses (9 and 10) to insure that the reader realized a definite break between the two descriptions. It would be like opening a file drawer and viewing white files that were divided by blue dividers. The blue divider in chapter 13 are verses 9 and 10.So that being said, I believe that in God's extreme mathematical order He dedicated verses 1-8 exclusively to the first beast and verses 11-18 exclusively to the second beast with verses 9 and 10 as the blue divider insuring that the descriptions of the two beasts would not be mixed up and remain in perfect mathematical order.That being the case, verse 18 which describes the number of the beast falls under the exclusive description of the second beast the false prophet.Let's look at the verse......"Here is wisdom. Let him (John Tng and others) who have understanding calculate (with math) the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666.John, through your diligent efforts you have tracked and deciphered this 666 number to be directly affiliated and referenced to Barack Hussein Obama. ......who by the way is a man and not a spirit being like the description of the first beast.The bottom line here is that you have proven to me through your research that Barack Obama is and will be the second beast, the false prophet described in verses 11-18.I believe that Satan many years ago sowed a deceptive seed when he convinced some influential person or group that the number 666 was affiliated with the antichrist and not the false prophet. This deception was somehow "poured in concrete" not to be questioned and has been perpetrated for maybe centuries as the truth........... when indeed it was a Satanic lie meant to deceive.If one just deals with the biblical fact that the antichrist comes up from the bottomless pit which means he's a spirit being (it is given to man once to die). And that the 666 beast has to be a man.....a living being. Then these facts put a clearer prospective on the deception.I would ask that any Doves reading this post take the time to re-read Revelation 13 with no preconceived beliefs that may have been "poured in concrete" and come to your own conclusion as to who the second beast, the false prophet is or will be.Congrats and kudos's again John on your research and your new YouTube video.......Blessings........John B
__
Hi brother,
Thanks for kind words.
Right now my study indicates that O is the leading man, but of course I may be wrong.
John