Mike Curtiss (15 Nov 2013)
"Another Source Agrees, Obamacare Fix is un-Constitutional"
Outlets are quoting Democratic operative Howard Dean saying of President
Barack Obama suspending certain Obamacare requirements, “I wonder if he
has the legal authority to do this.”
To remove all doubt: The Take Care Clause of the Constitution absolutely
forbids any president from doing exactly what Obama did Thursday.
Obama said he would allow insurance companies to keep offering
previously-offered insurance plans that Americans would like to keep.
Nobody knows if this means all plans, or only some of them, and how the
White House will make such determinations. He says he has “enforcement
discretion” to make this change to the Affordable Care Act unilaterally,
without consulting Congress.
This is a frightening claim of a sweeping power that is completely
inconsistent with the Constitution. A president has “prosecutorial
discretion” to prioritize which lawbreakers to prosecute in federal
court, but there is no “enforcement discretion” to determine which laws
on the books he will enforce.
Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution commands of every
president: “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
Like every provision in the Constitution, it has a legal meaning—and
that meaning is the Supreme Law of the Land, which Congress, the courts,
and—yes—each president is bound by his oath of office to follow
carefully.
Everyone should know from their high-school government classes that
Article I of the Constitution gives Congress exclusive power to make
federal laws, and Article II of the Constitution gives the American
president the executive power to administer and enforce those laws.
Article II then includes the language about how the president must
faithfully execute those laws.
Among other things, the Take Care Clause was inserted in the
Constitution to abolish the Royal Prerogative that the Framers of the
American Constitution knew from their lives as Englishmen. It was the
power of the king of England to disregard or effectively suspend Acts of
Parliament. The king could not make laws, but he could shelve a law
that Parliament had passed.
Obama’s announcement is a flagrant and undeniable violation of his
constitutional duty under the Take Care Clause. The provisions of
Obamacare causing enormous trouble for insurance plans are mandatory,
and only Congress can change those parts of the Affordable Care Act.
Every day provides additional proof that Obamacare is a complete train
wreck, but it is one regarding which only Congress can change the terms.
This president’s relationship to Congress is reaching toxic levels, due
in large part to the regularity of his hyper-partisan rhetoric and
ongoing disrespect. He is learning that the campaign tactics that
enabled him to win two presidential elections are manifestly
counterproductive when applied to the arduous task of governing,
especially in a country as large and diverse as America.
It is not clear at this point whether anyone would have standing to sue
over this matter in court. If the experts who are saying today that this
unilateral move will only make matters worse are correct, someone might
suffer an individualized injury that they could litigate.
President Obama should hope that doesn’t happen, because if a federal
court can get past the procedural hurtles to reach the merits of the
case, it’s an open-and-shut case that this president’s actions are
unconstitutional—again.