Ted,

You appear to be consistent in your analysis.

Others, who see things differently than you do, have, over the years, explained their understanding of things, on the radio, or in books.

Occasionally, something they say, does not fit with something else they have said, at another time.

It is usually not noticed, until the different parts are looked at, or listened to, together, side by side.

What is bizarre, is when it happens in two different chapters of the same book.

You also appear to reason your way from the first point, all the way to the conclusion.

That is much easier to follow, than when some just present a patchwork quilt of different things.

We do understand the 70 weeks differently from one another, but I have enjoyed finding out how you see it.