Gino (17 May 2020)
"Could he have mentioned it tongue-in-cheek?"


Is it possible that:

I Corinthians 15:29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?

Was asked tongue-in-cheek, i.e. sarcastically?
Were there people, at that time, practicing that, "for the dead", in a similar way to that mentioned in:

Deuteronomy 26:14 I have not eaten thereof in my mourning, neither have I taken away ought thereof for any unclean use, nor given ought thereof for the dead: but I have hearkened to the voice of the LORD my God, and have done according to all that thou hast commanded me.

Which also mentioned doing something "for the dead".
That doing things "for the dead" is a very catholic kind of thinking?
For years I thought that Paul was referring those who had been dead in trespasses and sins,
but who had gotten saved, and subsequently baptized.
However if he was speaking sarcastically about a heathen practice of baptizing for the dead,
like the mormons do, that could change the understanding of the line.
Could he have mentioned it tongue-in-cheek?