This article seems suspicious to me. Out of the blue, Hawaii responds and shows Mr. Bennett everything he needs to satisfy the requirement to be on the ballot. Just an "I saw it, it's fine, case closed". So why not release what he saw so that it can be viewed by all? So many others have already requested information from Hawaii and have been repeatedly rejected. Should be noted in the article that Bennett says he is not a "birther". Makes you wonder if one of a few possibilities happened to him; could have been anonymously threatened, could just be sweeping it under the rug to pacify those who have inquired, or maybe he received a different forged document.

I'd rather be known as a "truther". I'm fine with whatever the truth is, but pretty much all of us on this site are in accord that there have been too many inconsistencies from Obama's side on the issue. Family members' stories, different hospitals, different records forged (selective service), the Connecticut ss# (never lived there), millions spent on suppressing all of his records, the Alan Keyes 2004 senatorial debate (Obama said, "So what that I'm not a nb citizen--I'm running for Senate not the presidency), the recent admittance of the short-form bc forgery, computer graphics experts dismantling the shoddy long-form forgery, the Breitbart story that just came out about pamphlets saying Obama was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii and Indonesia, Obama getting his own age and birth year wrong multiple times during speeches and on his myspace account, and on, and on, and on....

(Regarding the Alan Keyes debate, I've looked it up online and found different stories regarding its authenticity. The one that seemed most genuine to me is testimony from one of the men who saw the original airing before it was edited out. Again, not sure of the validity but just more confusion surrounding this issue and Obama)

http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/2012/05/22/20120522obama-birth-hawaii-arizona-verification.html

Steve Mullin