(RE: Rowina (29 May 2012)
"To Patti C and Jan on recognition answers")

Dear Rowina,

I love your posts and gain a great deal from them.  I feel silly for my remarks, and when I think about it, everyone who writes on this site must wonder sometimes “did anyone get that”? 

I did read and look into your post on Stan Deyo and the Cosmic Conspiracy and gained a great deal of information.  In fact, I think you had the best answer to that question about the desire of women.

Proof, that I learned a great deal and did not take the time to thank you for sharing it with me.  You are so right; it would take up way too much time and space thanking everyone for their contributions.

Bless you for reminding me!!

Agape!!

Your sister in Christ,

Patti C.

############

(RE: Rowina (29 May 2012)
"To Patti C and Jan on recognition answers")

I do also realize that many read what we write and don't respond, just as I don't respond to everything written!
Doves would be a very long letter if we all responded to even half!

No one responded to my piece about how Stan Deyo translated "desire of women" as "Messiah", but I know
some have undoubtedly read it, maybe even went to Stan's material on it in the new translation of the Cosmic
Conspiracy.  Stan says that in Daniel's time the "Desire of Women" was a term for Messiah, as the women
hoped to give birth to Him.  That is what his new translation is about, of those lines in Daniel.  The rest of his
book was written decades ago, but it still as interesting as it was then.