Rowina (17
March 2013)
"I do not agree that
Pope Francis is a "liberation theologist""
I disagree with Tom Horn that the new pope is a liberation
theologist, based on the writings of Marx and other communists
and socialists.
He is instead a mentor of a conservative social movement which
aims to help the poor but not through the ideas of Marx.
He upholds all of the standard Catholic teachings of the most
conservative prelates, including denying birth control,
euthanasia, gay marriage, and abortion. At least this has
been his path so far as Archbishop in Argentina.
Not only that, he did not actively oppose the regime in
Argentina which put down rebellious citizens by making them
"disappear," including children who disappeared. He did not
support this movement nor fight it, from what I have read during
the last few days. He has been criticized for NOT
supporting "liberation" of the people. Other clerics say
that he never "turned anyone in to the authorities," but did not
actively oppose the dictatorial regime enough to win the
satisfaction of those who protested the "disappearances".
It may be that Pope Francis is a strong advocate of returning
the Church to the dominant force in Christianity, as is the goal
of his Jesuit Order. However, what I read today on line
from several sources said he was a friend of both Jews and
Muslims in the extremely multicultural environment of
Argentina. Perhaps he would be just the one to form these
people into an approximation of a "one world religion".
Jewish leaders in Buenos Aires said that he called them his
"elder brothers" and was their close friend. He was also
considered to be friendly
by Protestant Evangelicals in Argentina, often eating with them
and having discussions of where they could cooperate.
As a Jesuit, member of an order which prizes scholarship, he
speaks many languages and has studied the belief systems of
other religions. He is said that the Church must return to
a non-political role, being completely spiritual even while
working for the betterment of the worldly life of the poor, as
St. Francis did.
In the end, this approach may begin to bring back the power of
the Catholic Church, as Tom Horn said. But that is not a
fulfillment, in my opinion of the Malachy prophecy of Peter the
Roman. In that I agree with Jovial on Five Doves and
others who have taken this position. I could be wrong, as
I have just begun to view this new Pope and learn of his
background.
If the Malachy prophecy has any merit the final pope will NOt
succeed in dominating the world, neither the Christian or those
of other faiths. He will be attacked and brought down by
enemies even as he tries to shepherd the people. The
Church will be destroyed and the great Judge will come to
fulfill the prophecy of the Bible. I expect it may be that
Pope Francis may be among those saved by the Lord, even though
his Church will go down.