TO MARILYN AGEE

(Re: Marilyn Agee (24 March 2012)
"Patti C (23 March 2012) "ARE THE SONS OF GOD FALLEN ANGELS?")

Hello Marilyn!

Thank you for your kind and informative response. It was difficult to find 4 studies that did not support the fallen angel view…you are definitely in the majority in what you believe. First, let me say, that I agree with you 100% that there were giants, so if some of those studies argued that point, I, too do not hold that view.  Certainly in my personal study I maintain that there were giants, I just dispute their origin.

I find it interesting that no one challenged me on any of my findings until I got to the sons of God, daughters of men study.  I first maintained that there were two creations…that was my first revelation, and no one called me on that.  The next one, about Cain and Abel being twin brothers of different fathers, no one called me on that, either.

Next, I concluded that the mark of Cain was one of size, and that God made him a giant as protection, no one said a word about that.  Then how Noah married a direct descendant of Cain, and that is how, after Ham’s incest with his mother, Canaan was born and was the first giant this side of the Flood, thus carrying on the serpent’s seed line.  All the giants are referred to as Canaanites, even Anak. 

I just wonder why someone did not fault my chain of reasoning and biblical support, until I presented my finding on the sons of God.   In case you did not read my studies up to that point, I wanted to remind you of the foundation of my thesis, and why I came to the conclusion that they were not fallen angels.  One person did challenge the adultery and incest portions, but seemed to go along with, or ignore all my other findings.

So, perhaps, now that you know where I was coming from with my conclusions, you can shed some light on my other findings that led me to my conclusions about the fallen angels.  I respect your knowledge and would be totally open to any discussion about where I may have gone wrong.

Thank you for taking the time to send that information. Very interesting that they have found skeletons that are that large, and I totally believe that. If you have time, I posted a response to Mike Plunkett today, and raised the same kind of questions with him, and explained, in a bit more detail, where I was going with my personal study.

The four studies I have put on lately are not my own, but the only ones I could find, by reputable Bible scholars, to support the minority belief.  Just at an attempt to be fair about the issue.  I would not have come to the conclusions that I did, had I not come to previous conclusions about other aspects. I hope you understand what I am trying to say, and would greatly appreciate your take on the other revelations, I included in my complete study.

Thanks again for taking the time to share your informative and interesting information.

With much admiration and respect,

Patti C.

Here are the titles of each of my studies, in order, in case you would like to look at any of them. I will gladly e-mail them to you, one at a time.

1. Natural Man verses Spiritual Man

2. Flesh and blood verses Flesh and Bone

3. Righteous verses Unrighteousness

4. The Temptation

5.  Out of the Garden

6.  The Sons of God and the Daughters of Men

7.  The Flood and the Giants

8.  The Sons of Noah