TO DONNA DANNA

RE:Donna Danna (20 March 2012)
"REPLY TO PATTI C. -- THE SONS OF GOD & DAUGHTERS OF MEN"

 

I will clear up a few things simply here, because I do not want others to believe the points you are making, as they are groundless.  You are really out to debunk this study, and may I add, not in a very nice way.  At least I got you looking into a few things, and studying on your own and that is good.

First of all, about the Strong’s Concordance, and the numbers used for daughters, I stand by what I wrote.  I looked at it again, and the numbers I used are totally correct!!  If the NEW edition says otherwise…it is news to me!!!

Secondly, about the words men and man…you have to do a bit more research when it comes to Adam…as he is a very special man and stands out as being “the man”.  I covered this in my study called NATURAL MAN VS SPIRITUAL MAN, about their being two creations…you must have missed that one. So here is the part that dealt with that.

The Hebrew word for man is ‘adam’, and it is used to describe any man, men, mankind, and human beings.  This is the appropriate usage, in Genesis 1, as we can see that many men were created, not just one.  The Hebrew word for man, when used with the word ‘the’ in Genesis 2, means something different.  The word is haa-adam, with Article is ‘the man’, and eth haa-adam, as used in Genesis 2, means ‘this particular man’.   From this, we see that many human beings (mankind) were created in Genesis 1 and only one particular man is being formed in Genesis 2.

 

The rest of your post was did little to add or detract from what I was conveying, and I do not care if you believe me or not.  I am sorry, if by dividing my book into articles has been confusing, but I have covered your objections in one way or another, and maybe you should read them all before you go off in these directions.

I would like to mention here, that you have been rude and mean in your responses, unlike anyone else who disagrees.  You have put words in my mouth that I have never said, such as Satan had sex with Eve…I NEVER SAID THAT…I said he possessed the Serpent, and the serpent has sex with Eve….where else did Cain come from???  He is never mentioned in Adam’s genealogy and never considered his son!!   I covered all this too, but you have chosen to ignore that.

Please do me a favor…just agree to disagree because frankly I will not waste my time responding to you, anymore. You do not have to read them if they make you so upset!!!  I am only responding this time, because you are putting things out there that are not true, and it is beginning to feel like a personal attack.

The most important thing is that we love the Lord, and each other.  None of this will really mean anything if we let ourselves get hung up on things that make no difference to our salvation.  So forgive me if you think my study is wrong, and I will forgive you for being so negative, disrespectful and unfriendly in your responses.

 

May the Lord bless you

Patti C.