JFH:

Your entitled to your opinion but the evidence refutes everything you say.

The Geneva Bible is clearly an inferior Bible for today's serious Bible students interested in truth.  My post on the fraudulent passing off a 2003 edition of the Geneva Bible based on a flawed earlier edition simply revealed the reason it was published was not because it was superior but strictly for a matter of profits.

See my post on the Geneva Bible flaws in comparison with the KJVB.  I have a lot more evidence to come that exposes the inferiority of the Geneva Bible.  The 2006 Geneva Bible was a descent into mediocrity at best and a perpetuated fraud upon the consumer public.  The simple fact of the matter is the Geneva Bible reveals its own flaws and discrepancies when thoroughly examined.   

The rules of grammar preclude "He" being Christ in Daniel 9:27.  It behooves me as to how people remain in ignorance when the scholarship, of credible language experts offer irrefutable evidence to the contrary.  I can lead a person to the pure water of truth but I can't force them to drink from a well that is not poisoned.

I didn't expect to change your mind,  but it certainly doesn't make sense to waste your or my time.   As I have said before, one's salvation does not depend on what you believe about Daniel 9:24-27, or what day of the week you worship.  I see no purpose in belaboring this debate with you.

God bless,