re: Comparing The Fallen Angels to The Nordics & How They Are Tied To The Reptilians, Illuminati & The Occulthttps://www.fivedoves.com/letters/july2026/donnad710-4.htmYou stated: "As you know angels can appear to look like humans as show[n] in Genesis 19:1-11 when they appeared to Lot & the men in the city of Sodom who thought the angels were men as the men from Sodom wanted to have sex with them."It will surprise you, no doubt, that the above story of men wanting sex with angels is not in the *original transcripts. It is believed to have been made up by a priest named Damian while the Bible was still in the hands of the Roman Catholics. It was made up to create a new sin that King James would have to pay penance for which was needed to help build the cathedrals in Rome.My youngest brother attended Bob Jones University for a while. While there he studied the Bible in the original *Mazoretic text of the Pentateuch and looked back at the original transcript of the story about Lot and his two daughters. That version about the men of the city wanting Lot to hand over the two angels to them is not in the original transcripts, nor is it true that Lot offered his daughters to them instead. For the real story read on.
I prefer the King James version of the Bible to all others, however, here's what I have learned:
King James was raised by Catholics in a monastery, kidnapped by protestants and rekidnapped by Catholics. He knew how to read Hebrew and Greek. He said the "King James Bible" was not the Bible because he knew Hebrew and Greek, and therefore,
refused to sign it when it was finished by those tasked with creating it. When he died, those behind creation of the King James Bible added that it was an "authorized/approved" version, which it never was, and went ahead and printed it.The Bible we are reading today is not the Bible of the 1800s which had no verses against gays. The Roman Catholic church, via a monk named Damian, changed the text to create story lines that didn't exist previous to the King James. The scriptures were thus perverted by creating homosexual stories in the Bible so gays -- like King James who was also gay -- would be charged $5K to $50K (if they were rich) to make 'penance' for their sins. That's how the Roman Catholics came up with money to build their huge cathedrals.1) In the original manuscript there is no mention of homosexuality, nor of Lot offering his daughters to rioters and no lust for visiting angels, but it does mention that Lot carved idols for a living which apparently was considered too much of an embarrassment to the translators, and therefore, for reasons of religious correctness was omitted from the story we have today.
2) Additional evidence that the Sodom & Gomorrah story was changed from the original manuscript lies in Ezekiel 16:48-50 below. Since the translators didn't have computers to cross-check the Bible for any possible related connection to what they were doing, they completely missed Ezekiel's reference to why God punished Sodom. It, therefore, remains to this day as proof the Sodom & Gomorrah version we have is a gross concoction/misrepresentation of someone's overactive imagination, a need to fit an agenda, or both. Had they known Ezekiel's reference to the sins of Sodom existed, and would prove their story wrong, they would, no doubt, have removed it, or changed it to match their concocted version.3) So, what really happened? The original language tells a rather different story. It tells how Lot's daughters were what we would call nurses today. They would go outside the city walls and help the poor, lame, sick and elderly, showing hospitality to desert travelers by giving them food/water, etc. This type of hospitality was against the rules of the city, especially after hours as the city would lock up at a particular time each night for the safety of all. Lot was told by the guard at the gate -- who saw his daughters arriving after hours -- that as a result of what they had been doing, and for coming in late, they were going to be tried in a court the next day for breaking the law. That was why Lot fled the city with them.Also, you said: "So even a fallen angel like Satan can appear radiant like the Nordics. Also the fact the Nordics can "appear in both physical and non-physical form" like the angels and the fallen angels leads me to believe that the Nordics may very well be fallen angels as part of the great deception to men on Earth." [Ed., No, because they would already be locked up in Hell if they were fallen angels. All the fallen angels were locked up back at Creation except Satan. Had they not been locked up then, they would have destroyed the Earth many times over since then. Also, the ability to appear and disappear we now know how to do and it is used in our military. It isn't supernatural, it's just knowledge of science we didn't have until recently. However, shape-shifting is another thing entirely.]You said: "And if they aren't fallen angels, they very well could be hybrids made by Satan and his fallen angels along with hybrids like the Greys, Reptilians & Insectoids by combining the DNA of mankind with other creatures' DNA to come up with these weird looking creatures." [Ed., If they were hybrids of the greys/reptillians, then they would have features like them but they don't. So I would rule that out. And besides, the fallen angels are locked up in Hell awaiting Judgment Day. They may just be aliens infected with sin by choice due to interactions with humans and/or reptillians.]
When we get to Heaven, I am reserving a meeting with Jesus to get answers to all these mysteries. ;0"For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known."