I was always told that the following second advent vision shows both the Father and the Son:

Daniel 7:9 I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.

  10 A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened.

  13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.

It was explained that the Ancient of days is the Father, and one like the Son of man is the Son.

It is clear that that the one like the Son of man is the Son,

since it also says that he come with the clouds of heaven.

Jesus even referred to this when he was brought to trial:

Mark 14:61 But he held his peace, and answered nothing. Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?

  62 And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

Daniel 7:13 says that he came with the clouds of heaven, clearly a reference to the second advent.

Then it says, "and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him",

This was explained that Jesus is then brought to the Father, who is sitting to judge.

But wouldn't that mean that there would be a first advent of the Father to the earth,

before the second advent of the Son?

I don't remember Jesus mentioning that the Father was going to come to the earth to judge.

And that the Father would come to the earth first,

then Jesus would come back to the earth with the clouds of heaven,

but then to be brought to the Father, who would already be here?

Since this was a vision given to Daniel,

isn't it possible that this is prophetically showing the two natures of the Messiah?

Could not, "the Ancient of days", be referring to his Divine nature, that he is the Almighty?

If so, that would agree with:

Micah 5:2 But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.

John 5:22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:

That Jesus is also the Ancient of days, because he is the Almighty?

Also, that Jesus is the one who is going to judge, and not the Father?

Wouldn't this vision then show that Messiah would be both God and man?

So, which both is it?

Is the vision "both" the Father and the Son?

Or is the vision prophetic of the Messiah, who is "both" God and man?