Gino (11 July 2013)
"RE: Patti C: 07.09.13: pearl of great price"


Patti,

             I loved what you said!

Most of my life, what I’ve heard or read, was backwards from what you wrote.

Most people that I’ve heard & read seem to make us the ones who sacrifice, in order to buy, the ultimate treasure, Jesus or eternal life.

I’m so glad that you put the perspective where it should be, that Jesus is the one who sacrificed in order to obtain what was precious in his eyes, the church.

Those of us who are saved are a purchased possession:

 

Acts 20:28 ¶ Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.

 

Ephesians 1:14 Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory.

 

We don’t purchase Jesus, he purchased us with his own blood.

The way those two parables had so often been presented, was from a works salvation perspective.

It also made people feel good about themselves, that they wanted Jesus soooo much, that they sacrificed all that they had to get him.

When the truth is that, like you quoted, there is “none that seeketh after God”.

Also, salvation is a free gift to us, by grace through faith.

 

What you wrote is opposite to our pride.

Our pride, still resident in our hearts, our pride which is the lifeblood of our old nature, thrives on religion, especially on our works.

By nature we go the way of Cain, the deceitfulness of our old man, feeds our pride with works to either get saved or works to stay saved.

Either way, it is based on, “Look what I’ve done!”

It’s like saying, “I did everything I could, and now I’ll be rewarded with eternal life”.

Or it’s like saying, “Since I’ve been saved, I’ve done everything I could, so now I won’t lose that reward of eternal life”.

Both, however, are abominable, and opposite to the gospel of grace.

The LORD rejected that thinking when Cain first approached him that way, and he still rejects that thinking.

So, if Abel came with only innocent lamb’s blood, that was by faith.

It’s always been the same thing - the LORD only looked at innocent lamb’s blood.

Whether with Abel, or with the first Passover, all innocent lamb’s blood has been a forward looking picture of the blood of the Lamb of God.

The blood of the Lamb of God is the only thing that the LORD eternally looks at.

The blood of the Lamb of God is the only thing that can wash away sin.

The blood of the Lamb of God is the only thing precious enough to purchase wicked sinners from the just damnation of hell.

The blood of the Lamb of God is the only thing that keeps us ever clean before the eyes of the LORD.

 

A similar thing, where people have tried to use something in the scriptures to imply a works salvation is the following:

 

Matthew 19:24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

 

They quote line 24 and then go on to teach that this is actually talking about a very, low, tight & small opening, that fully loaded camels absolutely could not pass through.

They go on to say that if every last thing was stripped off of the camel, and if the camel squeezed as hard as it could, then it barely made it through the opening.

Again, they are talking about self-sacrificing & effort is what was needed to get the camel through the opening named, “The Eye of the Needle”.

So, in the context, they are thus talking about self-sacrificing & effort as being what is needed to enter the kingdom of God.

That is a works salvation interpretation, even though they supposedly prove their interpretation by citing someone’s commentary or quoting an Israeli tour guide.

 

Again, thank you for keeping Jesus the focus,

                          Gino