K.S. Rajan (4
July 2012)
"US
Quietly Moves Significant Military Reinforcements Into
Persian Gulf"
US Quietly Moves Significant Military Reinforcements Into
Persian Gulf
WASHINGTON — The United States has quietly moved significant
military reinforcements into the Persian Gulf to deter the
Iranian military from any possible attempt to shut the Strait of
Hormuz and to increase the number of fighter jets capable of
striking deep into Iran if the standoff over its nuclear program
escalates.
The USS Carl Vinson
The deployments are part of a long-planned effort to bolster the
American military presence in the gulf region, in part to
reassure Israel that in dealing with Iran, as one senior
administration official put it last week, “When the president
says there are other options on the table beyond negotiations,
he means it.”
But at a moment that the United States and its allies are
beginning to enforce a much broader embargo on Iran’s oil
exports, meant to force the country to take seriously the
negotiations over sharply limiting its nuclear program, the
buildup carries significant risks, including that Iran’s
powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps could decide to lash
out against the increased presence.
The most visible elements of this buildup are Navy ships
designed to vastly enhance the ability to patrol the Strait of
Hormuz — and to reopen the narrow waterway should Iran attempt
to mine it to prevent Saudi Arabia and other oil exporters from
sending their tankers through the vital passage.
The Navy has doubled the number of minesweepers assigned to the
region, to eight vessels, in what military officers describe as
a purely defensive move.
“The message to Iran is, ‘Don’t even think about it,’ ” one
senior Defense Department official said. “Don’t even think about
closing the strait. We’ll clear the mines. Don’t even think
about sending your fast boats out to harass our vessels or
commercial shipping. We’ll put them on the bottom of the gulf.”
Like others interviewed, the official spoke on the condition of
anonymity because of the delicacy of the diplomatic and military
situation.
Since late spring, stealthy F-22 and older F-15C warplanes have
moved into two separate bases in the Persian Gulf to bolster the
combat jets already in the region and the carrier strike groups
that are on constant tours of the area. Those additional attack
aircraft give the United States military greater capability
against coastal missile batteries that could threaten shipping,
as well as the reach to strike other targets deeper inside Iran.
And the Navy, after a crash development program, has moved a
converted amphibious transport and docking ship, the Ponce, into
the Persian Gulf to serve as the Pentagon’s first floating
staging base for military operations or humanitarian assistance.
The initial assignment for the Ponce, Pentagon officials say, is
to serve as a logistics and operations hub for mine-clearing.
But with a medical suite and helicopter deck, and bunks for
combat troops, the Ponce eventually could be used as a base for
Special Operations forces to conduct a range of missions,
including reconnaissance and counterterrorism, all from
international waters.
Be prepared for anything!
For President Obama, the combination of negotiations, new
sanctions aimed at Iran’s oil revenues and increased military
pressure is the latest — and perhaps the most vital — test of
what the White House calls a “two track” policy against Iran. In
the midst of a presidential election campaign in which his
opponent, Mitt Romney, has accused him of being “weak” in
dealing with the Iranian nuclear issue, Mr. Obama seeks to
project toughness without tipping into a crisis in the region.
At the same time he must signal support for Israel, but not so
much support that the Israelis see the buildup as an opportunity
to strike the Iranian nuclear facilities, which Mr. Obama’s team
believes could set off a war without significantly setting back
the Iranian program.
A key motivation for “Olympic Games,” the covert effort to
undermine Iran’s enrichment capability with cyberattacks, has
been to demonstrate to the Israelis that there are more
effective ways to slow the program than to strike from the air.
But this delicate signaling to both Iran and Israel is a complex
dance. Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who is
chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said that the
administration must strike a fine balance between positioning
enough forces to deter Iran, but not inadvertently indicate to
Iran or Israel that an attack on Iran’s nuclear sites is
imminent or inevitable.
“There are a lot of expectations to manage,” Mr. Kerry said in
an interview. “People need to know you’re serious, but you must
also leave room for peaceful resolution. It’s very important not
to take steps that send the wrong messages here.” source – NY
Times