Readers -

Michael Colunga in his post here:

http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/july2012/michaelc726-2.htm

appears to be responding to my post here:

http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/july2012/clay723-3.htm

where I take issue with the "extreme wording" of the post here:

http://www.jimseekamp.com/obama.htm

about O as the AC.

******

The "extreme wording" of the Lord Jesus, and the "extreme wording" of the Apostles is one thing, and I embrace, believe, and take no issue with any of it.

The "extreme wording" of Jim Seekamp's opinion about O as the AC, or any other forum's writer on this particular topic, is an entirely different thing. They are not the same thing, nor should they carry the same spiritual weight to any reader.

The "extreme wording" of these dogmatic opinions seems to indicate that the writer thinks there is NO POSSIBILITY THAT THEY ARE INCORRECT.

This is inaccurate. imho.

end of thread.

Jesus is Lord.
Acts 4:12