Hello John and Doves,
In this letter I wrote about Mike P's letter last week
on Covid-19 vaccine deaths in the UK, Jan - May 2023; and I
wrote about the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus
Pandemic hearing "Assessing America's Vaccine Safety
Systems, Part 1". What the UK data shows fits right in
with the third section of this letter. And we can see
why government officials called to the subcommittee hearing
have to be very careful what they say...it becomes obvious
in the third section of this letter.
Also, I wrote about this rather lengthy 38-page paper
titled "Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the
Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign" that
is damning to the FDA, CDC, NIH, Pfizer, Moderna, etc.
This paper is excellent! I wrote down some notes...
Part 1:
UK
Health Agency Data:
Mike P sent in a very good letter last week on the
data collected by the UK Health Agency. In the data it
was found that "the vaccinated population as a whole
accounted for 95% of all Covid-19 deaths between January and
May 2023, while the unvaccinated population accounted for
just 5%." And the 4x vaccinated population accounted
for 80% of all Covid-19 deaths.
"The Expose", in this November 26, 2023 article,
reported on this same government report - "..the
unvaccinated population has accounted for just 5% of
Covid-19 deaths in England since the beginning of 2023,
while the 3 and 4 times vaccinated population has accounted
for 5% of Covid-19 deaths among the vaccinated, while the
vase majority of those deaths being recorded among the 4x
vaccinated." The UK Government tried to hide this
information from the public. In this article is a
chart that shows the drastic decline of vaccine
effectiveness in 3x vaccinated people in England. Dropping steadily from
Week 3 to Week 13. This data was found in the Office
for National Statistics (ONS).
A much more shocking chart shows the number of
Covid-19 deaths for vaccination status of four groups (not
vaccinated, 1x and 2x vaccinated, 3x vaccinated and 4x
vaccinated) from Jan 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023. The
unvaccinated hardly had any deaths Jan - May. The
highest numbers of death due to Covid-19 were in the
vaccinated (1 and 2-dose) and 4-dose vaccinated in Jan -
May. When they added all the numbers together from Jan
- May for Covid-19 vaccinated - the numbers are
striking. 436 deaths in the unvaccinated. 1,023
deaths in the 3x vaccinated. And 8,330 deaths in the 1
- 2x vaccinated. and 6,902 in the 4x vaccinated.
Part 2:
Select
Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic: "Assessing
America's Vaccine Safety Systems, Part 1":
"Select Subcommittee Members pointed out the false
narrative about the efficacy of the Covid-19 vaccine and
pressed witnesses (from the CDC, FDA and HRSA) to explain
potentially politically motivated decision making during the
pandemic."
The committee noted that "Vaccine injury reporting and
compensation systems were not prepared to handle the
"avalanche" of injury claims caused by the Covid-19
vaccine."
The FDA Director, Peter Marks, responded to this with,
"We tried to be prepared for that, but the avalanche of
reports was tremendous." He added, "We
probably have not done a good enough job of communicating
sometimes the actual number of deaths versus what's in
VAERS."
James Comer, Chairman of the Committee on Oversight
and Accountability said the FDA ignored warnings about "the
dangers of accelerating the Covid-19 vaccine approval
process" and that Biden's vaccine mandate and the FDA's
rushed approval appear to correlate.
FDA Director, Peter Marks said "There was an
acknowledgment that an approval could allow vaccine mandates
to occur."
Comer noted that the vaccine approval occurred on
August 23 AND the military mandate was issued on August
24th.
Rep. Rich McCormick said that "the federal government
wrongly inserted itself in the doctor patient relationship
during the Covid-19 pandemic. This created a lack of
trust between Americans and their public health
system." People's doctors were censored by the federal
government - and people questioned the federal government's
authority to do that. And when people had immunity due
to a Covid-19 infection and yet were being told they needed
to get the Covid-19 injection anyway - people understood
that went against the science. "When the government
says we're going to make a carte blanche requirement without
taking science into account, it's no wonder people are
mistrustful of our recommendations."
Rep. Debbie Lesko asked Marks why "the publicly
reported data on vaccine injuries differs significantly from
the confirmed death and injury count available to FDA
officials?
Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks asked why were there a
backlog of claims for adverse events, by more than 10,000
due to the Covid-19 vaccines?
This looks like yet another committee that will get
nowhere. The 'wrap up' was "Americans deserve improved
vaccine injury and compensation systems." Like that
will go anywhere.
How about Americans deserve a vaccine that doesn't
kill and maim them? How about Americans deserve to
have a vaccine pulled when 50 people die from it? How
about Americans deserve to have their personal doctor
provide for their health care and not Fauci? How about
Americans deserve the truth about any 'vaccine' that the
government/businesses/colleges mandate? How about
Americans deserve the truth about any drug, any vaccine?
At least 40,000, if not more, people have died from
these injections per VAERS - which is highly underreported -
anywhere from 1% to 5% of adverse events are actually
reported. So that would suggest that hundreds of
thousands of people have been killed by these
injections. Mortality and morbidity are off the
charts. Then add those that die much later after
injection due to turbo cancers, blood clots, heart attacks,
etc. The number is in the millions. Just
look at England's number in the letter posted by Mike P.!
These subcommittees really do go nowhere...deflect,
deflect, deceive, play innocent or clueless....
Part
Three: The damning proof of the Covid-19 mRNA
vaccines.
And then we have this poor doctor - Dr. Annette
Bosworth, known as Dr. Boz on Youtube - she reported very
reluctantly (due to pressure from her followers) on Covid-19
vaccine problems - referring to this peer reviewed article
(the one I have notes on)
(403)
The biggest crime in the history of medicine - YouTube
run time 54:55
She said since she was reporting on a scientifically
true article written by her peers - an article that had been
peer-reviewed by numerous people in the top of their fields
-therefore it was OK to put this on her youtube
channel. Opps. Youtube does not allow any thing
that will interfere with the Covid-19 vaccine narrative -
you cannot report anything negative that might discourage
someone from taking this vaccine. That's the Youtube
rules.
And boy does this article have damning information on
this "vaccine" and their narrative! This was
definitely not the article to put on a Youtube
channel! After reading this, no reader will come
within ten feet of one of these injections!
I don't know where she has been the last 4 years but -
to her total shock and dismay - her channel got demonetized
by Youtube. There are Youtube channels that call
the Covid-19 "vaccine" the "V", the "jab", the "bee sting"
for a reason. People tiptoe around the Covid
"narrative" on Youtube - often speaking in code. It
doesn't take much to get spanked, censored, given time out
or demonetized!
In her very next Youtube video,
run time 5:15
here she is lamenting about what Youtube did to her
channel. She thinks because this paper was authored by
some outstanding cardiologists, epidemiologists,
researchers, etc. and peer-reviewed by top medical people,
and it was published in Cureus - a Journal of Medical
Science it should have been fine to post on Youtube.
Wrong!!! Dr. Peter McCullough's name should have been
a dead give away - a big red flag: "Don't touch this
research paper! It will burn you!"
She innocently became the next fly in the Google
web.
So what didn't Google like about this paper?
EVERYTHING!!
https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/review_article/pdf/203052/20240125-8235-1308nlg.pdf
In the Abstract, "Given the extensive, well-documented
SAEs (serious adverse events) and unacceptably high
harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a
global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all
relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA and
aberrant protein production are answered." Yep - that
will demonetize your channel right there.
Also, "After carefully analyzing the ACM (all cause
mortality) for Pfizer and Moderna trials.." there were found
to be 61 deaths total - 31 in the vaccinated group and 30 in
the placebo group. "These findings can be interpreted
as "no significant difference" or no gold-standard evidence
showing these mRNA vaccines reduce mortality." "The
fact that the mRNA vaccinations did not lead to a reduction
in overall mortality implies that, if the injections were
indeed averting deaths specifically attributable to
Covid-19, any such reduction might be offset by an increase
in mortality stemming from other causes, such as SAEs
(serious adverse events due to the mRNA vaccine.) "Even
the six-month Pfizer trial failed to show any reduction in
all-cause mortality.". Also, "the Pfizer
and Moderna registrational trials..reported a
non-significant 45% increase in cardiovascular deaths in the
vaccine arms of the trials. This outcome was
consistent with numerous reports of Covid-19 vaccine-related
cardiovascular pathology among both young and old segments
of the population."
These authors found "evidence of trial misconduct and
data integrity problems"...
"Regarding potential harms, assuming 30%
false-positive reports and a moderate under-reporting factor
of 21, we calculate a risk of 27 deaths per
100,000 doses of BNT162b2 (Covid-19 mRNA
vaccine). Thus, applying these reasonable,
conservative assumptions, the estimated harms of the
Covid-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for
every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths
caused by the modified mRNA injections."
Also, these trials did not report serious harms to
participants - this data was missing from the drug trial
reports. Adverse events were not reported past 60 days post
immunization. It was noted that pharmaceutical
company-sponsored trials usually only report 5% of adverse
events. They also noted that "the public was never
allowed access to the registrational trials' raw data, thus
precluding independent verification of AEs (adverse events)
by the scientific community. Such secrecy may have
enabled the industry to more easily present an inflated and
distorted estimate of the genetic injections' benefits,
along with a gross underestimation of potential harms."
"A recent forensic analysis of Pfizer's six-month
trial data revealed that many deaths in the trial occurred
AFTER the cutoff date used to create the briefing booklet
reviewed by the FDA and resulting in the authorization of
the vaccine; this effectively concealed mortality from the
decision-making part of the EUA process. The number of
deaths in the vaccinated group "continued to rise at a
consistent rate"..."it is likely that the general
public's perception of the vaccines would have been far
less favorable had they know that the mortality rate had
continued to increase among mRNA-vaccinated participants.
It
was determined that "Pfizer's reported number of 38
deaths is about 17% of what would be expected for the US
population." Also, Pfizer
did not disclose that "twice as many cardiac deaths
occurred proportionately among vaccinated compared to
unvaccinated subjects in the Pfizer trial."
And 17 cardiac deaths were concealed
"during the crucial phase of the EUA approval process,
masking the cardiac SAE (serious adverse event) signal.
"Beyond these omissions in SAE (serious adverse
events), the official reports of trial results was also
problematic." For example - 12 days after the first
dose, all cases of Covid-19 stopped suddenly. This
"contradicts biological plausibility". The trial data
shows that 21 days after the first dose, neutralizing
antibodies were only slightly elevated, peaking on day 28 -
that does not fit with the 12 days then "sudden
immunity". This casts suspicion of the validity of
these results. Also, by the end of the six-month
study, Pfizer had 'lost track' of some 400
participants. What happened to those people?
"A minimal number of deaths were recorded during the
initial 80 days, but a significant mortality
increase was observed around the 100-day mark
post-injection, indicating a pattern that cannot
be attributed to chance. Also, "nearly half of all
the cardiac events manifested within the initial 50 days
following the injection... Also, in
examining medical diagnoses before participation in the
trial - "all nine of the most prevalent pre-existing
diagnoses were more commonly found among participants in the
placebo arms. Moreover, there was a notable contrast
in the ages of deceased participants between the two
groups. These observed patterns were unlikely to occur
randomly. The only plausible explanation that aligned
with these anomalous trends was that the SAE records among
vaccine recipients were altered, relocating them to the
placebo arms post occurrence."
Pfizer trial did not include pregnant women - this was
not made public. Also, those participants in the trial
were never informed of potential risks before the trial
started.
The public was told that these vaccines would stop
transmission, when in fact, the "vaccine effectiveness"
trials were only to address "the reduction of
symptoms". It is "known that the Covid-19
mRNA products do not prevent either transmission or
infection....The benefit (of vaccination) is incremental and
transient...levels of antibody decline quickly. And
this decline is much faster in vaccinated recipients
compared to individuals who were naturally infected."
They reported on two other studies at the Cleveland
Clinic Health System..."vaccine effectiveness
against laboratory confirmed Omicron infection and
symptomatic disease rapidly wanes within three months of
the primary vaccination cycle and booster dose." The
second study showed that Covid-19 cases increased in subjects with
the most up-to-date Covid-19 vaccinations.
The authors ask, what is the justification for
the ongoing use of Covid-19 vaccinations? The public
was told that the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines protect against
severe disease, hospitalization and mortality. The
public was told that the mRNA vaccine protection were
superior to natural infection. Numerous studies
prove these narratives to be false. "Much
evidence now indicates that natural immunity confers robust,
durable and high-level protection against Covid-19 severe
illness."
In a large study in Israel, "previously infected
individuals who remained unvaccinated were 6 - 13 times less
likely to contract the virus compared to those who were
vaccinated." Vaccinated individuals "has a 27-time higher
risk of developing symptomatic Covid-19 and an
eight-time higher risk of hospitalization compared to
their unvaccinated counterparts."
Studies have shown that "there was no valid evidence
to "substantiate the claim that getting a second Covid-19
mRNA booster effectively prevents severe illness and
mortality.
Also, in comparing Pfizer to Moderna, Moderna
had "significantly higher risks of SAE (serious adverse
events) according to the clinical trials and a government
study.
Another study of some 5 million adults "who
had a SARS-CoV-2 infection (Covid-19) within 21 days post
injection showed an eight-fold increased risk of ischemic
stroke and a five-fold increased risk of hemorrhagic
stroke when compared to vaccinees without concurrent
infection.
As for SAEs (serious adverse events), the "officials
SAE rate for other vaccines is only 1 - 2 per
million." The Pfizer trial estimate of SAEs was 1,250
per million - that's a 600 fold increase above
'expected/acceptable'.
Two large studies done in the US and Europe "revealed
over 7.8 million AEs (adverse events) reported by
approximately 1.6 million individuals following Covid-19
vaccination." Examples of AEs were myocardial infarction,
pulmonary embolism, cardio-respiratory arrest, cerebral
infarction, cerebral hemorrhage associated with both mRNA
vaccines.
The estimated total number of US fatalities due to
Covid-19 mRNA vaccinations in 2021 alone was 289,789.
This was validated by a physician and survey research
specialist.
Autopsies have verified serious harm - "74% of autopsy
findings (240 out of 325 cases) were judged to have been
caused by the Covid-19 mRNA products. The mean
time from injection to death was 14.3 days and the vast
majority of deaths had the cardiovascular system as the
single fatal organ system injury to the body."
Multiple autopsy studies have documented Covid-19
vaccine-induced toxicities that impact the nervous,
gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal hematological, immune and
reproductive systems."
Also, Simian virus 40 (SV40) was found in Pfizer
vaccine - but not Moderna vaccine. This is the same
'contaminant' found in 1960 in the polio vaccines that
caused lymphomas, brain tumors, etc SV40 has been
associated with brain tumors, bone cancers, non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma and malignant mesothelioma. It is likely that
"SV40 functions as a cofactor in the genesis and progression
of turmors"...a cocarcinogenic impurity.
And, DNA plasmids have been found in the vaccine (the
Surgeon General of Florida said all Covid-19 vaccines should
stop so someone could investigate these contaminants) - and
impurities in a vaccine, like SV40, can increase the uptake
of DNA fragments into the human genome. This increases
the risk of cancer.
The authors note that in VAERS, there has been a 803%
increase in reports of autoimmune disease per million doses
of Covid-19 vaccine compared to the Influenza vaccine..
In their conclusion, the most shocking revelation was
the significant risk of SAEs (serious adverse events and
premature death, "even among a relatively healthy group of
participants." They saw a 31% increase in overall
mortality among vaccine recipients. And there was a
36% higher risk of SAEs in the Pfizer trial group. And
a four-fold increase in cardiovascular SAEs in the Pfizer
trial participants. Moderna and Pfizer
vaccines were both "linked with increased risks of
ischemic stroke, brain hemorrhage, acute coronary
syndrome, and other conditions known to reduce life
expectancy."
And there were "serious flaws in the methods used by
the FDA, CDC and NIH in the development and safety/efficacy
evaluation of new pharmaceutical products." Their
decision to call these 'safe and effective' was not based on
"an unbiased, thorough and transparent evaluation of the
evidence." These agencies should have been aware of
the problems with the AEs (adverse events) and mortality
data. In a
"393-page confidential documents requested by the EMA and
released in August 2022, Pfizer had by that time
documented approximately 1.6 million AEs covering nearly
every organ system. One-third of the AEs were
classified as serious. Among the findings were 3,711
tumors, 264 categories of vascular disorders (73,542 cases
total) over 100,000 blood and lymphatic disorders, 127,000
cardiac disorders (including 270 categories of heart
damage in addition to myocarditis and pericarditis),
77,000 psychiatric disorders (including psychoses,
depression, suicide, and suicidal behaviors) and hundreds
of categories of neurological disorders (696,508 cases
total), many of which are considered very rare,
a clear indication of grave hazards.
These estimates offer a striking contrast with the
official FDA document tilted "Summary Basis for Regulatory
Action" dated November 8, 2021, in which the review
committee voted to approve the Pfizer-BioNTech
product. The report's entire "Risk-Benefit Assessment"
section consists of a single sentence: "Considering
the data submitted to support the safety and effectiveness
of Comirnaty that have been presented and discussed in this
document, as well as the seriousness of Covid-19 the Review
Committee is in agreement that the risk/benefit balance for
Comirnaty is favorable and supports approval for use in
individuals 16 years of age and older."
Concerning excess deaths, "An extensive, multi-country
ecological analysis by Rancourt and colleagues estimated
that Covid-19 vaccination resulted in 17 million
excess deaths." The global vaccine-dose
fatality rate was approximately 0.1%. The
roll-out of the vaccines in many countries was followed by
"peaks in all-cause mortality."
They end with "Based on the research presented in this
narrative review, the global Covid-19 vaccination campaign
should be regarded as a grave medical error. Medical
errors represent a substantial threat to personal and public
safety and have long constituted a leading cause of
death. Misguided political and regulatory decisions
were made that the highest levels and may have been heavily
influenced by financial incentives."
Government agencies should not have allowed
"population-wide distribution of experimental genetic
vaccines."
"The usual safety testing protocols and
toxicology requirements were bypassed by the FDA and
vaccine manufacturers and the premature
termination of both trials (Pfizer and Moderna) obviated any
unbiased assessment of potential SAEs due to an insufficient
timeframe for proper trial evaluation. It was only
after the EUA that the serious biological consequences of
rushing the trials became evident, with numerous
cardiovascular, neurological, reproductive, hematological,
malignant and autoimmune SAEs identified and published in
the peer-reviewed medical literature." Also,
regulatory authorities failed to identify impurities (DNA
plasmids and SV40) in the vaccines during manufacturing.
"Since early 2021, excess deaths, cardiac
events, strokes and other SAEs have often been wrongly
ascribed to Covdi-19 rather than to the Covid-19 mRNA
vaccinations." Potential harms appear to be
excessive. And the SAEs present an unacceptable
harm-to-reward ratio. They urge a global moratorium on
these mRNA products.
20240125-8235-1308nlg.pdf
Google is ruthless - they have a narrative to
protect. Truth is just a casualty of war to them.
With all the damning information found by study after
study after study on these 'vaccines' - it becomes more and
more apparent that this 'vaccine' was done on purpose.
Covid-19 was created to get people vaccinated. Thus
the big push, mandates, threats, and vilifying of the
unvaccinated. This was pushed through knowing all
about the DNA contaminants, the SV40 impurity, the serious
adverse events....and this paper didn't even cover the
nanotechnology, the hydrogel, etc. that many have reported
on that's in these injections. What are these doing to
the human body? And what about the bizarre 'white'
clots that embalmers are finding? There is still a lot
of mystery with these.
God help us.
Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!
Maranatha!
Chance