Hello John and Doves,
Wanted to update
with a correction on Part 3 today - the "Members of
Congress convene to count the electoral votes" on Jan. 6
NOT Jan 7 - typo. Sorry about that.
In this update, I
wrote about:
The Belleville, NJ
mayor is trying to get to the bottom of these drones and
did an interview with Fox 5 New York news.
Conspiracy theories
are pointing us towards something very dangerous.
The lack of transparency from the government is fueling
these.
Also, a small
amount of radioactive material went missing in NJ on
December 2, but the drone sightings began on November
13....and have increased in number and spread to other
states since then.
There was a
Pentagon Press briefing - nothing much new came from this
even though there were lots of drone questions.
Sticking to the accepted narrative.
The House
Intelligence Committee had a three hour secret meeting in
a SCIF today with Justice, Defense and Homeland Security
top officials. With what came out of this meeting,
it sounds like it could have been held in a grocery store
parking lot. (See Cuomo's interview with Rep. Tim
Burchett (R-TN) about why a SCIF meeting.)
And New Jersey's
Division of Fire Safety sent out a list of safety concerns
for downed drones - like do not approach the downed
drone. Set up a 300 foot perimeter. Wear
protective gear. Notify local police, hazmat crews,
the bomb squad and the FBI. As it's "unclear if the
drones are carrying a payload". Is there more to
this than 'in an abundance of caution'?
Joe Rogan had an
interview with a former Navy pilot - I've seen him testify
to Congress about UAPs. This pilot had more info
than anyone concerning what's going on.
And Chris Cuomo
interviewed Rep Tim Burchett who thinks the Chinese are
somehow involved in these drones - the Chinese are
watching our response. And he interviewed Dakota
Rudesill who is an analyst of nuclear arms control and he
doesn't believe these drones are looking for missing
nuclear material or a nuclear weapon.
Rep. Burchett
bringing up the Chinese 'into everything in the U.S.'
reminded me of Pastor Dana's "The Hail to the Chief" Dream
from some two years ago. If there is a timeline to this
dream it would be the year 2025.
The Public isn't
buying the 'nothing to see here, move on' explanation
coming out of the White House, DoD, Justice Department,
DHS, etc.
Mayor Melham of NJ and Latest Drone
Info:
That Belleville, NJ mayor is on
Fox 5 New York in this interview (see Part 3 for more from
Mayor Melham). Melham said that every mayor in
New Jersey along with every member of his state
legislature. They learned very little.
'Information has not been forth coming.'
This lack of transparency is fueling conspiracy
theories.
People are continually
being told that they don't know what they are talking
about. There is some misidentification but, he said,
he can assure that they are seeing drones all over the place
in NJ.
One of the news anchors mentioned
a Bethenny Frankel who said she has a contact at the
Pentagon and these drones have something to do with
radioactive material in New Jersey.
Melham said the NJ State Patrol
said that we have assets over our critical infrastructure,
now. He thinks this is 'comforting' because it's us.
He thinks it's probably us. We have drones flying in a
grid like pattern - so they are probably looking for
something. They are aware of a threat, per the U.S.
government, that came in through Port Newark...maybe that's
radioactive material. There is an alert that went out that
radioactive material went missing on Dec 2. It was a
shipment. It arrived at its destination - the
container was damaged and it was empty. It was lost in
NJ. It could be anywhere. The drones are
spreading out to other states - sniffing for something.
One of the news anchors said if
this info is credible, why wouldn't the U.S. government say
this is us? Melham said that's the crazy part about
this. We've gotten very little information. Even
yesterday's meeting with the White House - mayors were told
'you guys are seeing things, there is no credibility to
this. We are not longer going to stand for not hearing
the truth. Our state government is failing us - they
aren't getting the truth from the federal government.
They were told 'there is nothing to see here.' Yet, today,
December 17, there is a top secret briefing going on in
Congress. What are they being told that the mayors
weren't being told yesterday?
They said that President-elect
Trump is getting the same briefings that President Biden
gets...and President Trump said he wasn't going to his home
in Bedminster, NJ now. Trump said our government
knows, our military knows and Biden knows what's going
on. He said our military knows where they come from
and where they go. (He does not say he knows). And he
said he's not going to Bedminster this weekend. He
said something strange is going on and for 'some reason'
they don't want to tell the public. (Listening to
Trump when he talked about this - it doesn't sound like he
was told what's really going on. I even doubt he gets
the 'exact' same briefings Biden gets - and Biden may not
get much.)
Melham said the concern is what
are these drones looking for? He wants the federal
government to fess up - tell us if they are ours. And
tell us what the threat is. He said the public should
not be shining lasers or shooting at the drones.
Melham believes THEY are looking
for something that's very dangerous.
run time 5:31
One Conspiracy Theory:
Here's an article on Bethenny
Frankel. "The Real Housewives of New York City" alum
then went on to claim that she's been speaking with someone
whose father worked at the Pentagon and NASA....He's been
watching this situation...these drones are ours...they could
very possibly be sniffing out something very
dangerous.....the areas where the drones have been spotted
in the Northeast have "spiked in radiation." She said
that this 'theory' made the most sense..."something is off".
Missing NJ Radioactive Material:
"A small amount of radioactive
material went missing in New Jersey earlier this month...The
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission confirmed on December 2,
2024, that a damaged and empty shipping container was
discovered after transit. The container, which once
held a GE-68 Pin Source used for calibrating PET scanners in
hospitals, has sparked widespread speculation and
unease...The NRC emphasized that the missing radioactive
material, classified as "less than Category 3" and
potentially shielded to Category 4, poses limited risk if
handled properly."
Missing
Radioactive Material in New Jersey Sparks Panic — Are
Drones ‘Hunting for It’? - EconoTimes
I read that the minimal amount of
radioactivity in this 'pin' would make detection extremely
difficult even with low-flying drones.
Interesting. This info we
released by the government - truth, a distraction? The
drone sightings didn't start on Dec 2 or after...they
started Nov 13 - mid-November - before this material went
missing. Maybe this missing nuclear materials is just
a convenient cover...?
If so, why the secrecy and why tell
people 'nothing to see here, move along'?
Pentagon Press Briefing:
Here is a press meeting with Air
Force Maj. Gen. Pet Ryder on December 17. Most of the
briefing was about the drones:
When questioned about the owners of
the drones, Maj. Gen. Ryder said none of the drones are DoD
assets - to his knowledge. And no testing of drones by
the military? To his knowledge - no. As for the
drones flying over military bases...there are 1 million
drones registered in the U.S. - the vast majority of these
drones are hobbyist, commercial - architecture, engineering,
farming, law enforcement. It's possible some are
malign. Drones over bases are not new...we attempt to
classify them. Each case is looked at separately,
commanders have the authority to respond to these. No
military operation or military drone experiments in that
corridor - the NJ/NY area.
We are taking this seriously - need
to track and ID these UASs (unmanned aerial systems).
He said new capabilities will enhance the ability to detect,
identify and track these..'drone busters' affects their
ability to operate. Drones are not new in the U.S. -
what would be deemed a threat? That's case by case
basis. Commanders determine this. The U.S.
military doesn't look at drones in the U.S. like they do
overseas.
One reporter asked it these are
just hobbyist drones, why is there a 'classified' briefing
on Capitol Hill? He said he'd have to refer her to
Congress on that. He said "We are sharing as much
information as we can." He has no information to share
on sensor data.
One reporter asked what's so
special about NJ? Ryder said he can't answer why so
many drones are being sighted in NJ. Maybe because
there is heightened awareness now. He read from his
papers that, "the current assessment is...we understand the
concerns...we will take this seriously....we will take
appropriate action as needed...we have not identified that
any of these reported drone sightings are anomalous or
present a national security or public safety risk over
civilian air space over NJ or other states in the NE."
(They are all on the same page in their public response.)
'Drone Busters' can bring drones
down - a counter UAS ability the military has - it emits a
signal that is able to interrupt the signal on the drone to
interrupt it's flight. Should they need to do this.
run time 17:18
One can tell Ryder is reporting
directly from what's on the paper he was given.
Keeping the story 'straight'. Also, one can tell
that the video has been edited. There are skips in
this briefing - obviously things have been removed.
Why was his press briefing censored?
And,
surely he knows exactly what Congress is being briefed on
in today's 'classified' briefing.
The
House Intelligence Committee is expected to have a
classified briefing on the drones today, Tuesday December
17 - they'll probably get the white-washed story like they
get from the Pentagon during the AARO meetings - 'nothing
to see here, move along'.
Like
Melham asked, why is Congress getting a classified
briefing and the mayors of NJ were pretty much blown
off. What information is different?
This
came out after the three hour classified briefing today in
a SCIF with the House Intelligence Committee and top
officials in Justice, Defense and Homeland Security - the
concensus is "that likely nothing nefarious is going on in
the skies" and they called for "increased government
transparency". They were "assured there is no
"imminent threat" posed by the drones and that most
sightings are likely just manned aircraft or stars."
They were told that "there is zero evidence of laws being
broken by any of these drones."
"Although
the briefing did not generate many answers, most lawmakers
said they were provided with enough evidence that aligns
with those statements - noting they believe there is
nothing malicious happening....To date, there is no
evidence that there's anything nefarious going on."
Well,
I guess Mayor Melham won't feel so left out now...sounds
like the NJ mayors got 'the same story' Congress
got. A whole lot of 'nothing to see here, move
on'. What a waste of three hours. This
contradicts what President Trump seemed to speak on
earlier - he said he wasn't going to his NJ property this
weekend. He believes there is 'more to the story and
the government knows what it is.'
This
secret meeting in a SCIF happened after Wright-Patterson
Air Force Base reported issues with UASs of multiple sizes
and configurations just days after shutting down their air
space:
And
this article came out on December 17 - "The
Wright-Peterson Air Force Base spotted "small unmanned
aerial systems" that "ranged in sizes and configurations
last Monday and early Tuesday morning - mere days after
spotted drones closed the facilities for several
hours." The air space was closed for "four hours
from Friday night into Saturday because of "small unmanned
aerial systems."
Also,
if there is a "downed drone", the "fire department was
instructed to wear hazmat suits, saying it's unclear if
the drones have a payload."
Just
telling us they are not doing anything malign or nefarious
is only part of the concern. The public wants to
know what they are doing and who is behind these.
Things the government is not willing to tell us.
These are too big to be hobbyist drones and too small to
be manned airplanes and no one in the government, that
I've come across, has addressed the fact that there are no
transmissions coming from these drones - that is required
by FAA to be legal. And no one in the public has
come forward to say that's their airplane, that's their
drones. No one has claimed the 50 drones that came
in from the Atlantic Ocean. And why isn't FAA
involved in these briefings?
And this article came out on
December 17: Why are their special instructions for
handling 'downed' drones. If downed drones are an
issue, why wasn't this information put out years ago.
Why now?
Fire crews were told to not
approach a downed drone - wear protective gear, set up a
safety perimeter of more than 300 feet and contact a host of
first responders immediately. These are local police,
hazmat crews, the bomb squad and the FBI. And the
wreckage could contain hazardous materials.
Joe
Rogan Interview:
Joe
Rogan interviewed an ex-Navy pilot - this pilot testified
to Congress on UAPs. This pilot doesn't think the
drones are looking for a 'lost nuke' - he thinks ground
crews would be better at this.
Rogan
asked why these haven't been tracked down. This
pilot said this started about two years ago - Langley had
drone incursions show up right before Christmas for about
two or three weeks - this has now happened three years in
a row. They operated over the base. Same time
period. This year they came back in a bigger swath -
NJ, NY, Pennsylvania, etc. This has been occurring
for about three years over military bases. Maybe
this is all linked. He said the Langley pilots he
talked to this year and last year said that their infrared
systems were not able to lock on to these drones. So
they do exhibit some sort of signature management.
They should be producing heat, yet, they can't be
detected. He said this is not a technology he is familiar
with for drones.
This
pilot said 'the word on the street' is these seem to be
coming in from over the ocean - don't know if coming out
of the water or from some location in the ocean.
They are flying low, some operate in a group.
Unknown about their emitting energy or not - radio
communications or active sensor systems. Seems the
government doesn't know. He is guessing there may be
about 1,000 total - this isn't just a few. They
could have a self-contained navigation system - they would
be completely autonomous. What is their task?
Sensing something? He can see a fully self-contained
autonomous drone system that is doing something with
passive sensors that allows it to operate without
emissions - making it harder to track. Depends on
what they are looking for - they could have infrared
systems.
Law
enforcement is saying that their systems are not able to
pick these systems up.
Based
on what he's seen, some are down low, making 3 - 5 G turns
at relatively low air speeds, indicative of a significant
power source. And can remain in the hour for several
more hours then go over the ocean where they are
untraceable.
Rogan
said, they aren't sending up jets, they aren't tracking
them. Why are there so many? Why can't they
stop this?
These
are mostly flying in G air space. If this isn't a
foreign adversary, it's a U.S. citizen - then they'd need
a warrant. This is how they are proceeding. To
be able to intercept the signals they need special
paperwork. To follow up with drones over a base,
they need the Sect of Defense's approval.
(there
is more to the interview but this all that was on this
channel)
run
time 15:10
Cuomo
Interview:
Cuomo
interviewed Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN). Cuomo asked -
There was a classified briefing, why would you need one if
there is 'nothing to see here'? Burchett said they
bring you into the briefing and then you can't talk about
it and if you do you can be brought up on charges and even
if it's something you already know. He believes that
there is a combination of things going on. He thinks
the Chinese are using this. The Chinese are into
everything. He doesn't know if they are 100% behind
this. But remember the Chinese spy balloon.
The Chinese are cold and calculated. They monitor
everything. They have spies every where. They
are monitoring our response. He predicted that
'we'll end up moving on and something major will happen
with these drones'. They have componetry in these
things. They know where they are. They know what's
going on. They are watching our political
reaction. They are watching our military
reaction. They are watching our media
reaction. Our government is poo-pooing this.
Cuomo
next interviewed Dakota Rudesill who is an analyst of arms
control and nuclear weapons issues. Cuomo asked if
these are military drones and if these are nuke
sniffers. Rudesill talked about the missing pin in
NJ - he wouldn't connect this with the drones at
all. No search underway for this component.
And he doesn't think the drones are looking for a missing
nuke.
run
time 9:27
'There
is nothing nefarious or malign with these drones.
There is no public safety threat or national security
threat.' Yet....
The
states definitely need some legal authority for their
state police, over their skies/air space concerning UAS
- drones/etc. for radar detection, interception,
identification, and blocking technology to take down if
deemed necessary.
This
is what I've gotten on December 17, we'll see how this
story develops. These drones are not a nothing
burger - this is going to get much bigger, imo.
Given the time period that we are in...before President
Trump is sworn into office...there is lots of concern of
something BIG happening during these next few weeks.
IF this is Chinese, which wouldn't surprise anyone, they
do not want President Trump to take office. Along
with many others in our government. (Maybe there is
a stand down going on, like there was with the Chinese spy
balloon.)
Rep.
Burchett bringing up the Chinese - how they are into
everything in the U.S. reminded me of Pastor Dana's dream
- 'Hail to the Chief'. Many high ups sold the
country out to the Chinese. Dana is watching on a TV
- for the State of the Union Address to start. The
Chinese end up taking over. The dream takes place in
the Capitol Building where the State of the Union Address
is given. IF there is a timeline in this dream..it
would be the day of the next State of the Union address?,
possibly, and in the year 2025. As the man in the
dream said, for the fall of the U.S., "And it all took
place in less than 250 years." Dana thinks there is
a timeline in this dream - a time frame. For the
U.S. to be less than 250 years old, this time frame would
be 2025.
The
Hail To The Chief Dream - Dana Coverstone - YouTube
On
July 4, 2026 the U.S. will celebrate the 250th anniversary
of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.
America250
Pray
for the peace of Jerusalem!
Maranatha!
Chance