Hello John and Doves,
Now the presence of drones
have resulted in the shut down of an air base in Ohio -.
Wright-Peterson Air Force
Base. This is a major U.S. Air Force Base - this is
huge!
And there is a link to an
NBC News interview with a NJ mayor - he's thinking
these are U.S. assets and they are possibly sniffing for
something because of their flying in a grid like pattern.
(Parts 1 and 2 suggested this also.)
And NY and NJ have new drone
detection systems.
President Trump chimed in
with his thoughts. And John Kirby was interviewed by
Brett on Fox News.
And there's a link to Hal
Turner's December 16 latest update - seems he's had his
previous article from last week (Part 2) confirmed.
But he's not actually saying it. He's saying 'read
between the lines.' Read below for more from him.
Nothing we can do if
'someone is set on setting something off' before they can be
stopped - it THEY really do want to stop them. Mass
panic won't help and leave for where?
Wright-Patterson
Closed:
"Home to the 88th Air
Base Wing, Wright-Patterson is one of the largest and most
strategically important bases in the U.S., tasked with
advanced research, intelligence and operations."
Air Force Base air traffic
control said "they were diverting 'over base' air traffic
due to 'heavy unknown UAS activity', adding to 'use extreme
caution' as Wright-Patterson is 'now closed'. (UAS =
Unmanned Aircraft Systems)
Mayor Melham of Belleville,
NM Interview:
In this Youtube video, NBC
News interviewed Mayor Michael Melham of Belleville,
NJ.
He said the Feds are saying
'nothing to see here' - he had a second phone call with the
Feds - this second one was with the White House
Intergovernmental Affairs where they told him 'they are
seeing nothing', 'they are not seeing any drones', the
public is 'seeing manned aircraft'. He said this is
insulting. He and some 200 mayors are 'getting tired
of this'. They've had these things hovering 100 feet over
their houses.
The Feds can't tell us what
these are, yet they can tell us there is no national
security threat going on. "If it's not a threat then
why can't you tell us what we are seeing?" Lots of
frustration with the government.
Melham said you can't say
'you have no idea what it is' and also say 'it's not a
threat'. Can't have it both ways, he said. "You
can't keep telling us that we are imagining this." The
NJ State Police told the mayors that they know for a fact
that these are hovering over NJ critical
infrastructure. A mayor in northern NJ has 80
square miles with four reservoirs there, four critical
infrastructure - she had 60 drones hovering over these this
last Sunday.. The State Police in the briefings are telling
the mayors that these things are not emitting a radio
frequency. (See Part 1 from last week for more info on FAA
rules.) Residents are concerned. And lack of
transparency fuels conspiracy theories.
The people are being told by
the government that they are overreacting, that they are
seeing police helicopters, and commercial airliners landing
and taking off, etc. etc. Sure, this could be
happening, but Melham has drone-trained police officers look
at video sightings who confirm that these are drones and are
not manned aircraft.
Melham said it's ridiculous
that 'THEY have technology that can read your driver's
license from a mile up in the sky, probably while it's still
in your pocket'. But they can't tell us what's flying just
above our homes.
NJ has the best
drone detecting equipment, but these things are not
emitting radio frequencies. So they can't
be jammed and brought down.
He believes that it's not a
foreign adversary. Because of the blinking lights (the
ones required by FAA)...He believes these are U.S.
assets. Deployed to look for something.
He's not concerned with who the drones belong to now, he's
concerned about what they are doing. He
suggests they are sniffing for something because they keep
flying in a grid like pattern.
New Drone Detection
Systems - NJ and NY:
"NJ has received three new
drone detection systems from the federal government that are
being deployed near sensitive infrastructure." The NJ
governor has said from the beginning that that these are
small planes and not drones. (I think he's been 'let
in on the secret by the government'.)
NJ
receives new technology to identify mysterious drones |
PIX11
A drone detection system is
being deployed in NY state also. "Officials say the
drones do not show up on the regular FAA flight radar
screens."
President Trump and
John Kirby Interviews:
President Trump had a press
conference, December 16 - he says our government knows
what's going on. Our military knows where these come
from and where they go. For some reason the government
is keeping this quiet. Something strange is
going on and they don't want to tell the people.
run time 3:27
John Kirby was interviewed
on Fox News, he said based on the information they have,
involving some 5,000 sightings, and interviews with
officials - "our assessment is that this is lawful, legal,
commercial, hobbyist, and law enforcement aircraft
activity. Some of it is manned, some of it is
unmanned....A lot of these are probably drones, but they are
flying legally." He says they are legal as long as
they are registered with the FAA. The government's
position is, stated by Kirby, "these are legal and lawful
drones flying for the common good." "Every case
they've looked at" - they've seen nothing that's a public
safety risk. Drones fly over the U.S. all the
time. No foreign adversary. They are looking at
drones over U.S. military bases - but that's totally
different. This is lawful legal activity, whether it's
manned or unmanned. Congress needs to close gaps in
UAS rules.
Things Are Adding
Up:
Last week Kirby was adamant
that they were all manned aircraft. Not drones.
Today he's saying a lot are unmanned aircraft. John
just can't seem to keep his story straight or make up his
mind. It remains to be seen how truthful he actually
is, but he has a history of lying to the American
people. About Ukraine, the Middle East, etc. - all to
fit the narrative/agenda. he just dances around the
truth.
A BIG problem Kirby isn't
addressing, or he's purposefully avoiding, is these drones
in question are NOT emitting signals - emitting a signal is
an FAA requirement. They are not legal, lawful if they
don't emit a signal with their ID and location. (See
Part 1 for FAA rules.)
We know there are powerful
people who do not want President Trump to take office.
Who do not want the Republicans to take the House and
Senate. Some will do whatever it takes to stop
this. And America has many enemies.
Detecting drones is good,
but what are they actually doing? Seems no one can
touch these and they can't bring one down. IF our
government knows about a nuke or dirty nuke, or multiples of
these, brought into that area of the country, they would use
sniffer-drones to try to find these..and spread out as
needed. Maybe that's why this has spread from NJ to NY
to Connecticut, to Pennsylvania, to Virginia, to Ohio....And
the bases, reservoirs/dams other critical infrastructure are
big targets. (Maybe there are WMD chemical-sniffer
drones for bombs, poisonous gases, etc.) Kirby is
covering for the real reason the drones are out there - I
suspect to prevent mass panic.
Hal Turner - 'Read
Between the Lines':
Hal Turner has a follow up
article to last weeks: Last week he wrote he had no
confirmations on his story about nuke-sniffing drones - now
he's reporting he's gotten word from "seven different
sources out of the New York Police Department". He
knows it's "possible that people will die from the lack of
reporting" and it's "possible that a lot of people
would die with the reporting." But he's not going to
report what he knows, as "media outlets are damned if we do,
and damned if we don't."
He wrote, "It appears we're
going to take a "hit"...a very big hit. An
unprecedented hit. Bad. Waaaay bad....The feds
are looking for something on the ground. Something
bad. that's all I can tell you. Read between the
lines. The RUMORS...appear to be true."
I'm not seeing a 'date' for
this 'hit' - we've got Christmas Eve (Chanukah eve),
Christmas Day, then New Years Eve and Day after that.
December 21 is the Winter Solstice.
Then government dates:
On Dec 25, "The president of
the Senate and the national archivist must receive the
electoral certificates of each state by the fourth Wednesday
in December." That's Christmas Day. On Jan. 3,
the "new Congress is sworn in before its members count the
presidential electoral votes." On Jan. 7, "...Members
of Congress convene to count the electoral votes."
Key
Electoral College dates to know before Inauguration Day :
NPR
The mystery continues....
Pray for the peace of
Jerusalem!
Maranatha!
Chance