Hello John and Doves,
With all that's going on, it
wouldn't be a big surprise. Do a false flag attack on
a NATO country, then blame Russia. Then they get their
WW3 via Article 5.
The author, Alex Krainer, wrote
that it was brought to his attention that hundreds of
webcams across London had been turned off. He showed a
screen shot of London Webcam Live CCTV Camera No 27/11/2024
14:19:48. All the cameras are black/off.
So I checked Webcam London REAL
Live Camera Today 01/12/2024 03:02:34 - the timers are
running on each cam but no pictures. I don't know what
this means or what is going on. But there are no
pictures. ??
The author wrote, "They're
planning a false flag event to blame on Russia....they
are planning a false-flag terror attack on London which
they'll blame on Russia, so that they can trigger an
all-out, whole-of-society mobilization by all of the Western
powers against Russia."
"Now if this seems far-fetched,
there are now several important elements that fit
coherently with this scenario, starting with the general
political state of things."
The West and the UK "bet heavily on
Ukraine and lost." The situation "has become as
undeniable as it is hopeless. But Western powers
aren't showing any inclination to cut and run..."
"Ukraine is too important for them
and the stakes could not be higher. The "prize is the
whole world". (I wrote in a couple of previous Doves
letters about the elites saying that if they win Ukraine,
they win the whole world - it's that important a prize.)
US Chief of Staff under Biden,
Mark Milley said "If we lose Ukraine, we will lose the world
for decades." And Boris Johnson in April 2024 said,
"If Ukraine falls it would be a catastrophe for the West, it
would be the end of Western hegemony..."
The author continued, "It is
unlikely that the empire's vested interests will quietly
accept this "catastrophe". This is why they are
escalating provocations against Russia, desperately hoping
that the Russians will strike at a NATO member nation,
creating a pretext to invoke Article 5 of the NATO Treaty
and unleash a unified response where the collective West
would confront Russia in a whole-of-society effort and
hopefully snatch a victory out of the jaws of defeat."
He noted the attacks on the Lusitania in 1915, Pear Harbor,
and 9/11 (he gave several more examples) - 'provocations
that triggered an intended response'.
"A new false flag attack, aimed at
triggering World War III against Russia wouldn't be unusual
in the context of history."
"I believe that this is the reason
why Western powers are encouraging Ukraine to strike into
Russia with their missiles, even though there is almost
nothing to be gained. Such escalation only makes them
directly involved as belligerents in the conflict.
This is why incredibly, the U.S. is suddenly discussing
providing Ukraine with nuclear weapons. They
may hope that Russia will respond impulsively, but they
know that Vladimir Putin almost certainly won't take the
bait. That's where the false flag comes in, probably
in the shape of the detonation of a nuclear weapon in
London."
"Suppose if such a device were
detonated from a shipping container on a ship or a truck,
some Webcam might catch the event. But if all the
Webcams are dark, the news - which will have their stories
scripted beforehand - can report that it was a Russian
missile, and it would be very unlikely that anybody could
ever prove otherwise." (ex. remember when the BBC
reported the collapse of one of the WTC towers 20 minutes
before it happened? Yep.)
"Switching off all Webcams in
London can't be a random event....For one thing, I could be
wrong...But if I happen to be right. The one way false
flag events can fail is if the public sees through
them....if the public is forwarned and expects that a false
flag might take place, they might suspect that it was "an
inside job" and the attack could blow back into the
conspirators' faces. I have therefore decided to take
a risk of ruining my American readers' long weekend and to
also risk embarrassing myself."
Are
they planning a false flag event in London? | ZeroHedge
The U.S. was throwing out "Russian
false flag operations" before Russia invaded Ukraine.
"U.S. Intelligence" was saying that Russia was planning a
"false flag" event as a pretext for
a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. "Russia has
dismissed the claim." There were no false-flag
attacks carried out by Russia. Russia just attacked
- they had plenty of reasons.
And also, in several Doves letters
I wrote about Russia saying that a false flag would be
carried out by the West, and Putin would be blamed.
They announced this to the whole world. To get
people's attention.
Many people have been wondering why
the West keeps pushing all of Putin's and Russia's
buttons? Why give permission to use long-range
missiles deep inside Russia? Biden did. Then
Britain. Then France. Then in the same week,
Biden gave permission to use anti-personnel minds.
Then the Biden administration suggested giving Ukraine
nuclear weapons! And just a few days ago, a NATO
chief, Rob Bauer, said that NATO should target Russia's
missile launch sites!
So, NATO is saying that they should
preemptively strike targets in Russia. Russia's FM
Lavarov sees it this way also. "Mr. Bauer is either a
fool or a provocateur, Perhaps both at once", Russian MP
Mironov said.
Russia
Accuses NATO of Pushing for Preemptive Strikes
It sure looks like, to many people,
that the West is pushing Russia to act in a big way against
the West - like possibly respond with a nuclear
weapon.
Will Putin fall for it? He
hasn't yet. But if the U.S., Britain, etc. can't get
Putin to react to all of these blatant provocations, it's
not beneath them to do a false flag attack and blame
Putin. Then they will have their war. I suspect
that there are others, like this author, looking for a false
flag attack that blames Russia. And it might not be on
London. But it will have to be bad enough to galvanize
the West against Russia.
Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!
Maranatha!
Chance