And on August 7, 2024, this
article came out. It is a long article that
connects a lot of dots concerning WHO, Big Pharma and
pandemics - Covid-19 and the coming pandemics. WHO
is helping set up a permanent and standard response to
pandemics and setting Big Pharm up for stealing all of
our money under the guise of 'keeping us safe'.
I think this is much more evil
than just the sin of 'greed' - their desire for control
over us was quite evident during the Covid-19
pandemic. And it's obvious that they don't care
about our well-being as they still refuse to admit the
Covid-19 "vaccines" harm people. It was not safe
and it was not effective. Reports have been coming out
about how it did nothing to prevent illness, it did
nothing to stop hospitalizations and it did nothing to
stop death. In fact, the morbidity and excess
deaths due to the "vaccine" are off the charts. It
brought much morbidity, mortality - much suffering and
grief to mankind. This was pure evil.
Isn't that what satan
does?
"..Big Pharma is using
WHO to restructure the drug market, so inadequately
tested vaccines and other drugs will face minimal
regulation and entire populations can be compelled to
take them each time the WHO declares another global
pandemic."
And it looks like we'll
be facing TWO WHO-declared pandemics - bird flu and
monkeypox (mpox).
According to the below article
and a journalist named Max Jones: "The
pharmaceutical industry is facing a "patent cliff" by
2030, as many of its blockbuster drugs are set to lose
their patent protection, placing $180 billion in sales
at risk and threatening to topple the industry."
"Luckily for Big Pharma, the
WHO and its private backers "are pursuing an
unprecedented legal process that would cement loopholes
that could solve these significant market challenges of
at least some biotechnologies. Such loopholes made
Pfizer and Moderna's Covid-19 mRNA vaccines - the
paradigmatic example of this new strategy - Big Pharma's
highest-selling annual market success ever.'
"Distribution of the Covid-19
vaccines to approximately 70% of the people globally was
possible only because of the "fast-tracked,
deregulated development and mandated consumption of
the experimental drugs... The industry hopes to
replicate that model with other drugs. And it
has already begun - last month the Biomedical Advanced
Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, gave
Moderna $176 million to develop an mRNA bird flu
vaccine."
According to Jones, Big Pharma
"has it's eyes on the only solution (to the "patent
cliff" - $180 billion dollars in sales) that can keep
its money and power intact - the full takeover
of the public sector, specifically the World Health
Organization and the regulatory system that now holds
the entire market hostage." Big Pharma
"has become too big to fail" and "over the next 6 years,
faces a new round of potentially disastrous patent
cliffs."
Many companies have acquired
biotech and biologic companies to offset their coming
loses. However, these biologic products are "more
complex, unpredictable and difficult and expensive to
make" than chemical-based drugs that we are use
to. Biologics require cutting edge technology.
"..the unpredictability of biologics has proven to
make them consistently unsafe."
The mRNA Covid-19
vaccines are biologic drugs - they "were
associated with an excess risk of serious adverse
effects and cause fatal myocarditis. CRISPR, the
most popular gene editing biotechnology, often silences
and activates genes it isn't meant to, leading to
adverse effects such as cancer. And the
antibody-drug conjugates (drugs designed as a targeted
therapy for treating cancer) are noted to cause serious
adverse events 46.1% of the time..."and are
significantly associated with sepsis in cancer patients,
which increases mortality."
Big Pharm would have trouble
getting consumers to buy into these new biologic drugs
with their high adverse effects if WHO
wasn't "pursuing an unprecedented legal process
that would cement loopholes that could solve these
significant market challenges of at least some
biotechnologies, and which already proved to make Big
Pharma record profits during the Covid-19 pandemic,
when normal regulatory hurdles were removed."
"The mRNA Covid-19 vaccines
quickly became Big Pharma's highest selling annual
market success ever. As a result of the Covid-19
vaccines, Pfizer made $35 billion, while competitors
BioNTech and Moderna raked in $20 billion each in 2021
and 2022. Bill Gates turned his $55 million
investment in BioNTech into $550 billion. 70% of
the US population is now fully vaccinated, as well as
70% of the world population."
"This could not have been
achieved without the fast-tracked, deregulated
development and mandated consumption of the experimental
drugs - a plan that was, regarding fast-tracked
development (not mandates), outlined in the Pentagon-run
Operation Warp Speed and legally authorized by the FDA's
emergency use authorization and the WHO's Emergency
Use Listing (USL).
The goal is to
"institutionalize the procedures that were put in
place globally for Covid-19 to pave the way for a new
pandemic market."
In other words - THEY
are looking to bring more "vaccines" in for the next
pandemics - bird flu and monkeypox - and follow in the
Covid-19 "vaccines" footprints. But with more
legal controls - like the IHR and amendments.
With the declaration of
"emergency", "vaccines" can bypass all regulatory
hurdles that would have kept them off the market due
to safety concerns.
"The Covid-19 vaccines
went to market in just 326 days, a fraction of the 10
- 15 years it typically takes to go to market.
This timing was critical to the Operation Warp Speed
(think DoD) goal of vaccinating the entire American
population...many people accepted vaccine mandates
without question for a drug that was rushed to
market."
WHO has adopted what the U.S.
military did and "recently approve critical revisions to
the International Health Regulations (IHR) and continues
to draft its recently shelved WHO CA+ treaty."
These are to 'prepare the world for the next
pandemics.' Their "Global Health Security doctrine
and the "One Health" agenda - would further codify
surveillance-heavy and emergency deregulatory measures
that would create a massively profitable and permanent
market for certain products in Bid Pharma's new biotech
arsenal."
The US is pushing to get
biologic drugs out to the public "under the guise of
pandemic preparedness".
Last week, the US HHS
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
(BARDA) gave Moderna a $176 million dollar grant to
"accelerate development of a pandemic
influenza vaccine that could be used to treat bird flu
in peoples, as concern grows about cases in dairy cows
across the country."
The public will be manipulated,
coerced, forced to take these new "vaccines". WHO
has essentially become an arm of Big Pharma. We
saw how WHO was able to "morph the entire international
regulatory process for the benefit of the pharmaceutical
industry during the Covid-19 pandemic.
These new laws will solidify that influence further
and legally bond the entire global community to the
permanent pandemic market being built on Big Pharma's
behalf." And 'faster' vaccines means
mRNA "vaccines."
WHO has an Emergency
Use Listing (EUL) - when WHO puts a drug in
the EUL, that unapproved drug is now ready to be
expedited to the people via a public health emergency.
COVAX is the WHO global vaccine
distribution program. Vaccines on the EUL are
available to COVAX as 'authorized' and
'prequalified'. Bill Gates is financially involved
in COVAX.
During Covid-19 pandemic,
"COVAX's stated goal...was to accelerate the
development, production and equitable access to Covid-19
tests, treatments and vaccines. It was led by the
Bll Gates-founded Gavi, the WHO, CEPI and the
Gates-funded UNICEF have all pushed for accelerated
vaccine development for the pandemic." (CEPI works
to accelerate the development of vaccines and other
biologic countermeasures against epidemic and pandemic
threats so they can be accessible to all people in
need."
Home page | CEPI
)
COVAX has a "no-fault
compensation program' "that worked to reduce the risk of
litigation for vaccine manufacturers by indemnifying
manufacturers against any financial losses they may
incur from the deployment and use of vaccines.
In other words, the WHO worked to exonerate Big Pharma
companies of legal and financial liability from
adverse events produced by its rapidly approved Covid
vaccines. Thus, Big Pharma, with WHO's
assistance, was not only able to rush troubled products
to market, but with the complete impunity for any harm
those products may cause."
Through the IHR and WHO CA+
treaty, WHO is trying to "solidify their global
influence by using the United Nations organization as a
proxy, codifying their policy agenda under the auspices
of the most recognized international health organization
in the world. The IHR/WHO CA+ would make
the Covid-19 pandemic response (with rushed,
under-tested, mandated products) the "default response
to public health concerns." This would
create a "permanent financial market centered around
pandemic preparedness and response." Utilizing the
"One Health Agenda. One Health is healthy
ecosystems, healthy humans, healthy animals - these
address "the full spectrum of disease control - from
prevention, preparedness, response and management.
Surveillance is a big part of "One Health".
Surveillance of pathogens of pandemic potential goes
hand in hand with the research and development of
medical products to counter those pathogens. This
results in a continual, cyclical market - find a
pathogen, make vaccine to pathogen.
This research and development
(R&D) could be used for a "vaccine" to prevent a
pandemic or to produce a biological weapon. This
is where the WHO CA+ comes in - the latest draft "states
that member states must implement "laboratory biological
risk management in order to prevent the accidental
exposure to, the misuse or or the inadvertent release of
pathogens." The question raised is, will R&D on
dangerous pathogens be actually done for the purpose of
"preparedness". We saw what happened with the
Covid-19 virus. CEPI funded R&D for the
Covid-19 vaccines and will fund future pandemic pathogen
vaccines (like for bird flu and monkeypox) CEPI
was started in part by the Gates Foundation. CEPI
has been instrumental in shortening the development time
of new vaccines. And deregulation helped with
rapid development and distribution of unapproved medical
products. This is vital to IHR and WHO CA+.
"The WHO's EUL of the Covid-19
vaccine, which caused severe side effects, demonstrated
the consequences of rushing a drug to market under the
guise of an emergency. It also, however, proved
that providing a regulatory option for unapproved
biologic drugs that allowed developers to skip normal
testing procedures could be massively profitable.
In the midst of chaos and fear, the standards of most
people could be brushed aside in the name of safety -
a phenomenon perhaps most effectively demonstrated
through vaccine mandates."
Last July, 2023, the EU's
digital Covid-19 passport system was adopted by
WHO. Travel was based on vaccination record,
negative test results and previous infections.
Because 51 countries in the EU used this system - many
more people got the vaccine. This digital vaccine
passport restricts civil liberties.
In the U.S. we saw various
'mandates" - many people lost their jobs because of
vaccine mandates by employers. Some restaurants,
stores required proof of vaccination to enter.
Theatres, churches, health clubs were closed because
they couldn't survive the six-foot mandate. The
Biden administration made vaccines mandatory for
Medicare and Medicaid hospitals - threatening
pulling their funding if all the staff wasn't
vaccinated. Threats, coercion, nothing is below
these people.
The new IHR will require WHO to
give guidance to member states in the use of
digital and non-digital systems to access medical
records, health documents, etc. There will be
"standards" for vaccine passports. And WHO has
their Global Digital Health Certification Network
(GDHCN) - this would be like the EU's, but on a global
scale. Travelers 'rights' will depend on the
member states requirements for digital health
credentials.
These systems "will place the
right of citizens to do basic activities - like
traveling, eating at a restaurant or working their job -
in the hands of governments.. The rights of
civilians will be conditional...domestic governments and
a global bureaucracy will have access to everyone's
health information.
This new IHR "provides
sufficient regulatory opportunities for unapproved
medical products to make their way to market in the face
of a pandemic
1.) WHO wants
biosurveillance on entire population of "pathogens with
pandemic potential." (Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation has been doing this for years.)
2) Rapid sharing of data
and research to help coordinate global pandemic
responses and "pandemic prevention." WHO announced
this data-sharing with a new mRNA bird flu vaccine from
Argentina. (Some suggest this could encourage
gain-of-function research.- doing research and
development on a potential future pathogen, creating a
mRNA vaccine and then profiting from it.
3) Speed up emergency
authorization via new regulatory pathways. This
would help unapproved medical products get to the market
during pandemic emergencies faster.
4) Global mandates of
unapproved products. - WHO wants to be able to mandate
unapproved medical products like vaccines. And
mandate a digital pandemic passport system. or "immunity
pass" or 'digital vaccine passport. "Who is also
developing its Global Digital Health Certification
Network which expands the EU digital passport system to
a global scale."
"The UN is seeking to impose
digital identification as a 'human right', or rather as
a condition for accessing other human rights, for the
entire global citizenry by 2030, as established in its
Sustainable Development Goal 16.9". This would
result in basic activities like travel, dining at a
restaurant, employment "in the hands of the
governments..."
"The rights of civilians will
be conditional, dictated by data stored in a massive
digital hub that is global in its sharing
abilities. Not only will domestic governments have
access to the health information of their own citizens
under this system, but an entire global bureaucracy will
as well."
"The WHO purports that its goal
is to "promote health, keep the world safe and serve the
vulnerable' - but can it truly do that when implementing
international laws that definitively serve giant
corporate interests and diminish the human rights of the
general public? The financial corruption infecting
the organization has made it subject to the influence of
its private stakeholders, who create policy that
enriches Big Pharma."