Listening to Steve Quayle and Pastor Lankford on Friday's Hagmann Report, much is said there, against the pretrib doctrine of the catching away. 

After hearing or reading some other debates, there really are some scriptures that support both approaches to a few passages about the timing of the catching away.

It is very interesting that more pre-tribbers can acknowledge why they think post-tribbers view certain passages a certain way, though they personally don't agree with it;

But the other way seems far less often, that a post-tribber can at least understand how a pre-tribber may view a passage.

This is similar to how someone who believes in eternal security can at least understand how works-based folks could see a passage;

But works-based folks more often cannot see anything but antinomian heresy by those who believe in eternal security.

This is also similar to how someone who believes that a man's will plays a part in repentance & calling on Jesus,

can learn and see quite a lot of the doctrine of election and the sovereignty of God;

Whereas the other way sees any part involving man's will as heresy, and cannot see how certain scriptures could ever be viewed that way.

Not sure how to explain this, but those three phenomena seem to happen those 3 ways more than the other 3 ways.