Eaglet,

That is so different from the way I was taught.

Were you taught that way, or did you conclude all of that on your own?

How long have you seen those seals that way?

Why would there still be the need for sacrifices in the temple in the thousand year kingdom?

Hebrews 10:1 ¶ For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.

 2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.

 3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.

 4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.

The question was, "For then would they not have ceased to be offered?".

The answer of the past couple thousand years is that they have been.

They were type, a pre-shadowing, of the cross, that was yet to come, in the days when they were offered.

It doesn't say that they will be restarted as a memorial of the cross.

Only the Lord's supper is mentioned in the scriptures as being done in memory of the cross.

Also:

Hebrews 7:11 ¶ If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

 12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

 17 For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

The priesthood changed, from Aaron, to the order of Melchisedec, with Jesus.

There is no mention of the priesthood being changed back again, for Aaron, via Zadok's seed (Ezek 43:19).

So is it possible that the things prophesied in Ezekiel 40 - 48 were what would have been, under the law?

But that all those things are now fulfilled in Jesus Christ?

And that he was, and is, and will be in the kingdom, the better fulfillment of those things which were only a shadow?

The sacrifices that were under the law, and the prophesied future sacrifices of the law, are they not shadows of good things to come?

There has been no need for those sacrifices, under the law, since the cross, correct?

And there will also be no need of those future sacrifices, under the law, as the law has been fulfilled in Christ?

Romans  10:4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

Hebrews 9:8 The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:

 9 Which was a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;

 10 Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.