Michael, thank you for responding. No, it's not that I am right...the Word of God is right. And if I had posted something contrary to scripture, I would want to be told. Was my directness offensive? If so, I'd like to apologize to both you and Mr. Dunn. But I'll admit to getting a bit ticked when reading what the false prophetess had to say about reincarnation.Speaking for myself, I'm at the age where I would rather hear the truth as opposed to empty flattery. Isn't there the danger that your silence, my silence, could be interpreted as a tacit admission of agreement re questionable theology? If I'd gotten a bad hair cut, then silence is preferable. However, when it comes to the Word of God, which both you and I agree is under attack, then I will do as the Bible (Jude 1:3) states and "... earnestly contend for the faith."
- Remember when a Dove by the name of Day posted a request (March 23) asking mature believers to take the time and effort to "biblically correct, in love, in which I also write, those who promote as 'God's truth,' things which are not contained in God's Word...for the sake of the Body of Christ, for the sake of the lost, and for Christ Himself." And do you remember what your response was?
So that plus Kaballah, Mark of the Beast, reincarnation, etc., was why I posed the question to you.Once again, thank you for taking the time to respond.