Chance (20 Sep 2020)
"Updates on the COVID-19 Testing and The Coming Vaccines"


 

Hello John and Doves,
 
Just another example that shows that those at the CDC have no idea what they are doing.  
 
This is quite obvious in their reversal of their recent reversal.  The CDC had recommended not getting tested if you were exposed to someone with COVID-19 and you weren't showing any symptoms.
 
"CDC walks back COVID-19 testing guidance that was reportedly published against scientists' objections"  September 18, 2020.  https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-walks-back-covid-19-190841049.html
CDC walks back COVID-19 testing guidance that was reportedly published against scientists' objections
 
Now they are saying, one should get tested for COVID-19 if you have been within 6 feet of someone for at least 15 minutes who has a 'documented' infection. 
 
First of all, 6 feet is an arbitrary number they just pulled out of the air.  There are no documented studies showing 6 feet is the COVID-19 'ideal' distance.  There have been studies that show this virus can travel 27 feet and other studies that it can linger in the air.
 
"Confirmation of aerosol transmission, at distances of 6.5 to 15.7 feet, was made by University of Florida experts in virology and aerosol science, according to a research paper (see pdf link below, August 4, 2020)....suggesting a risk of inhaling the virus near carriers who cough, sneeze and speak."  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-latest-airborne-aerosol-outbreaks-social-distancing-a9667706.html
Coronavirus: Scientists find 'unambiguous evidence' that Covid-19 can remain airborne | The Independent | The Independent
 
"Viable virus was isolated from air samples collected 2 to 4.8m away from the patients....Patients with respiratory manifestations of COVID-19 produce aerosols in the absence of aerosol-generating procedures that contain viable SARS-CoV-2, and these aerosols may serve as a source of transmission of the virus."  Their findings "strengthen the notion that airborne transmission of viable SARS-CoV-2 is likely and plays a critical role in the spread of COVID-19. For aerosol-based transmission, measures such as physical distancing by 6 feet would not be helpful in an indoor setting and would provide a false-sense of security."https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.03.20167395v1.full.pdf
Viable SARS-CoV-2 in the air of a hospital room with COVID-19 patients
 
Secondly, we were told COVID-19 was extremely contagious...now you have to be near a person for at least 15 minutes to 'catch it'.  "15 minutes" is another 'out of their' hat number.  And no comment from the CDC about picking up the virus from a surface.
 
In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, March 17, 2020,  "Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-Cov-1" researchers found that SARS-CoV-2 was viable in aerosols for 3 hours (that's as long as they ran their experiment) and was "more stable on plastic and stainless steel than on copper and cardboard, and viable virus was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces."  https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2004973
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 | NEJM
 
Third, and most importantly, what is a 'documented' infection - a positive PCR test?  A positive antibody test?  It appears that a 'documented' infection is anyone who has had any COVID-19 test and it's positive.  Because they could be an 'asymptomatic carrier' or they could be 'pre-symptomatic'.
 
CDC admitted that 90% of the positive tests don't have enough virus to cause an infection or infect someone.  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8679307/Experts-say-USs-coronavirus-positivity-rate-high-tests-sensitive.html
Experts say US's coronavirus positivity rate is high because tests are 'too sensitive' | Daily Mail Online
 
The CDC "called the changes a "clarification" that was needed "due to the significance of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission."  https://www.aol.com/article/news/2020/09/18/cdc-drops-controversial-testing-advice-that-caused-backlash/24624032/
CDC drops controversial testing advice that caused backlash - AOL News
 
"Fauci says the WHO's comment on asymptomatic spread is wrong.  Here's the difference between asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic spread."  June 10, 2020
 
 "Asymptomatic spread is the transmission of the virus by people who do not have symptoms and will never get symptoms from their infection.  But those infected carriers could still get others very sick."
 
"Pre-symptomatic spread is the transmission of the virus by people who don't look or feel sick, but will eventually get symptoms later. They, too, can infect others without knowing it."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/09/health/asymptomatic-presymptomatic-coronavirus-spread-explained-wellness/index.html
Asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic coronavirus spread: What's the difference, and why does it matter? - CNN
 
 
Well, now that we've got that straightened out.....
 
FOX news interviewed the CEO of a new 'HOME rapid COVID-19 test'  - saying they hope to have this kit available soon for the public once approved by the FDA.  You can do the test in the privacy of your own home as many times as you'd like.
 
And now, from the Department of Defense and the Department of Health and Human Services (link below):
 
1)  The vaccine will be given free of charge, i.e. no out-of-pocket expenses for the vaccine, it's distribution or it's administration.  The CARES Act requires health insurance issuers and plans to cover recommended COVID-19 preventive services - i.e.the vaccines - without cost-sharing.  Same goes for Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act.
 
2)  Their plan calls for pediatric, adult vaccine kits "which would support the vaccination of up to 660 million doses of vaccine.  These kits will include needles, syringes, alcohol pads, vaccination cards, and limited PPE for vaccinators."
 
3)  Administration sites will be health centers, schools, workplaces, mobile clinics, and pharmacies.
 
4)  Monitoring:  "The vaccination program requires extensive data monitoring infrastructure, including appropriate IT architecture, to incorporate claims and payment processes, to identify when a person needs a potential second does, to monitor outcomes and adverse event, and to account for products the U.S. government is spending billions of dollars to research, develop and produce.  Data will need to be available both federally and at the state, local, and tribal level to ensure efficient management of the vaccination program."

From the Factory to the Frontlines
https://media.defense.gov/2020/Sep/16/2002498509/-1/-1/1/OPERATION_WARP_SPEED_STRATEGY_FOR_DISTRIBUTING_COVID19_VACCINE.PDF
 
The long term safety of this vaccine will be assessed during Phase 4 - post-vaccination of the public.  THEY will look for side effects not reported or identified during (any) clinical trials.
 
Federal officials, and members of the the U.S. military will not have a direct role in delivering these vaccines or injecting them per officials at "Operation Warp Speed".  September 16, 2020  https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/coronavirus/article245774500.html
Feds won’t touch COVID-19 vaccines, officials say | McClatchy Washington Bureau
 
It's looking more and more like a vaccine won't be ready before 2021.  January 2021, or later.  CDC Director Redfield addressed the Senate on 9/16 and said "the U.S. can expect to resume "regular life" in the second half of next year."  "...vaccinations at a small scale could start by November or December and ramp up, and it will be "six to nine months to get the American public vaccinated."   McKesson is the company that distributes vaccines for the U.S. government and will be used for the COVID-19 vaccine.
 
The top 3 vaccine companies - Moderna, Pfizer, and BioNTech will conclude Phase 3 Trials soon...hoping to have results by the end of October, 2020.  Pfizer is ahead of the other companies with 29,000 subjects enrolled and over 12,000 are already on their 2nd dose.  Vaccine manufacturers will be ready to hand over millions of vaccines as soon as their particular vaccine is approved as their manufacturing facilities are already producing their vaccines. And since the FDA is approving on 'emergency use authorization' and on each company's data....who could not possibly be approved?
 
"Trump health officials prepare to distribute coronavirus vaccine within 24 hours of OK from FDA"  Sept 16, 2020  "The U.S. government plans to transport a coronavirus vaccine to U.S. distribution sites within 24 hours after the FDA grants an emergency authorization or approval, according to senior administration officials.  The CDC outlined a sweeping plan Wednesday to make vaccine for COVID-19 available for free to all Americans.  The CDC said it anticipates a Covid-19 vaccine will initially be granted an emergency use authorization before a full formal approval." https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/16/coronavirus-vaccine-trump-health-officials-are-preparing-to-distribute-within-24-hours-of-fda-ok.html
Coronavirus vaccine: Trump health officials are preparing to distribute within 24 hours of FDA OK

 
For example, BioNTech, announced 9/17/2020, that it's buying a vaccine plant in Marburg, Germany from Novartis so it can produce tens of millions more vaccine doses a month - pending regulatory approval....The plant is expected to be fully operational in the first half of 2021..."In full production operations the production plant will increase BioNTech's capacity to produce vaccines by about 750 million doses per year or more than 60 million doses per month."  https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/17/health/biontech-vaccine-production-plant-grm-intl/index.html
BioNTech buys new plant to boost production of potential coronavirus vaccine - CNN
 
These vaccine companies are counting on their vaccines being approved.  I'm not seeing any doubt!!   And some of these vaccines are mRNA vaccines - and there has never been a human mRNA vaccine before.  What can possibly go wrong?
 
THEY are pushing these vaccines as hard as they can - before full testing, to distribute and start vaccinating within 24 hours of emergency approval, and for FREE!!!  
 
On 13 Sept 2020, I sent a letter to Doves "Vaccination Distribution By November 1 and Shipping Concerns". Vaccination Distibution By November 1 and Shipping Concerns
The more complicated the shipping, the more problems can result.  As for vaccinating us with frozen vaccines, how long do they sit and thaw before injection? how long until the mRNA starts to break down?  And what does the mRNA break down into?  Do 'breakdown' products have side effects?  Protocols for vaccinating will vary per manufacturer. 
 
I see this as a HUGE Pandora's Box.  Too rushed, too little research, too much money at stake.
 
And there is WAY TOO much money, moving too quickly.  Making millionaires and billionaires of those with their hands in the pie.  Big money pushing this vaccine on the public.
 
And then there are those looking for ways to depopulate the planet....
 
Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!
 
Maranatha!
 
Chance