Bea
(21 Sep
2006)
"Question about the antichrist"
This is to all the Doves.....
I was having a discussion about the antichrist today
and just wanted to get some input on what some of you think.
In Daniel 9:26&27 the antichrist is described in
the role he will play concerning the peace covenant and the desecration
of the temple. It is my understanding that the desecration will occur
at the halfway mark of tribulation. This will result in increased
persecution of anyone who will not submit to the antichrist's authority.
This is where I think that people will be forced to take the mark (of the
beast) instead of taking it willingly as in the first 3 1/2 yrs.
The second half of tribulation will see the saints being martyred for their
faith (as described in Revelation).
My question involves how the Jewish people will regard
him. Will the antichrist be accepted by the Jews as their messiah?
I would wonder why, if they do accept him as messiah, they rebuild the
temple and continue to have animal sacrifices? Wouldn't all this
stop if their messiah was among them? And, if the ark of the covenant
is in the rebuilt temple, why they would need it if their messiah had returned?
If I understand the scripture correctly, when the antichrist
desecrates the temple (whether by entering the Holy of Holies or by an
unacceptable sacrifice) this is when the Jews realize that he is not the
savior of the world that he claims to be. But does this mean that
they have accepted him as their messiah, the Christ? Or do they just
view him as a great man who has the answer to the world's problems?
The main question is "If they see him as the messiah, why would they care
if he entered the Holy of Holies (since he would be G-d)"? And wouldn't
any sacrifice that he made (if they see him as their Messiah or G-d) be
acceptable? Since he is among them, wouldn't he be able to take away
their sins instead of an animal sacrifice?
So, exactly what part will he play for the Jews?
Do the Jews see their Messiah as G-d come in the flesh as Christians see
Jesus as part of the trinity?
If he is veiwed as Messiah, why would an animal sacrifice
still be necessary? And as Messiah (or G-d) wouldn't he have access
to any part of the temple and be able to make any rule he wanted?
I have always thought that the man who is the antichrist
would be accepted by the Jews as their Messiah, but now I am wondering
about how he will be seen by them. I hope my question is clear. I
would love to hear some other thoughts about this.
Bea
http://thehive.home.insightbb.com