Wow what a change.Mark Rouleau
rouleau-law@afo.net
Note #8889 from PCUSA NEWS to PRESBYNEWS:05463 Sept. 7, 2005
Correction
A recent Presbyterian News Service story about the report of the Theological Task Force on the Peace, Unity and Purity of the Church - #05446, headlined, "Force wraps up largely thankless task: What the proposed 'authoritative interpretation' would and wouldn't do" - contained two errors.
1. Where the story originally said:
"Examining committees could not take refuge in a 'don't ask, don't tell' policy, simply declining to question candidates about sexual practice (reportedly the de facto practice in some presbyteries); the AI would require them to probe into every officer-elect's sexual ethics and practices, without exception."
It should have said (and now does say):
"It would allow - but not require - ordaining bodies to approve candidates who express 'scruples' about the theology that underlies G-6.0106b. Previous PJC decisions as to whether a committee may or should explore a candidate's sexual practices would still apply."
2. Where it originally said:
"There is no provision of Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) polity that sanctions 'marriage' rites involving same-sex partners or permits PC(USA) ministers to bless such unions or characterize them as 'marriage.'"
It now reads:
"There is no provision of Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) polity that sanctions 'marriage' rites involving same-sex partners or permits PC(USA) ministers to bless such unions if they are characterized as 'marriage.'"