"......his office mates related the next week when we returned from vacation to DC that they were called that day to a meeting at the south-most building.  As the plane passed probably just inches over the top of the building the loudness of the noise called them to a window to see what was going on.  They thought the plane was making an emergency landing (the Reagan National airport is only a few miles from there) and thought it unusual as they heard that the plane was on full power. They rushed to the window and arrived just in time to ! see a  PLANE--not a missile--crash into the Pentagon."
 --Linda--
 
   HELLO,
 
  First of all, from where and how do you get the "French" being involved in all this?  <G>And unless you have authentic video to prove the missile theory is a "lie", then its still not proven to be a total "lie" as yet.Also, from looking over the enclosed web site below, your husbands colleagues had better take a number and stand in line, because there appears to be a whole slew of other eye witnesses, and no one person or group really seems to have a firm grip on what was really seen concerning this saga; only that there was probably some type of jet involved.(The account and opinion of a local female air traffic controller on duty there that day tends to shed some interesting light on the topic, concerning a jet fighter possibly being involved--that also being linked within the below web site.)
 
  Otherwise, you say that your husbands colleagues were gathered in the southern most building away from the Pentagon.That building must be very far away, because the Pentagon's primary parking lot is also south of the Pentagon, and it is a big time huge parking lot covering many acres (about 50-60 acres might be close).Also you say the airliner came in directly over their building--on the south side.That's impossible--the Pentagon was hit on its west side, with the flying object coming in also straight from the west.Then you mention about those distant buildings sitting on an ascending slope which would bring a good view into question.Overall, the colleagues account on its face sounds just as inclusive as all the rest, as also mentioned in the below web link.As far as all the other alleged eye witnesses, they all probably have some kind of version that may or may not vary.
 
  Now me............I don't know for being 100% sure what it was; but there are many of us out here who do want to know.And I'm not going to get all ga-ga about a 747 airliner going into that small area unless I see some of the authentic video to that effect, which shows that fact for a fact; of which all video was confiscated by the Fed's and has never been released.And I want to see the real deal--meaning not video that has been sliced and spliced, and otherwise altered--but untouched.If I see unaltered, authentic video, showing that a 747 went into it; then I will be a satisfied believer once and for all.Otherwise, I'm no meek sheep for what George Bush, or his cronies and followers have to say concerning this at all.
 
  http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pentagon/spencer05.htm
 
 _______________________________________
  (LUKE 21:36)
 Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man.
 _______________________________________