The kitchen is
where the raw material (data, scripture) is prepared for eating and for serving
others to eat.
The backyard is
different because the obstacles which existed are no longer there in
hindsight.
The tall trees
--overshadowing words of other men (a wholesome tongue is a tree of life)?no
longer impose on your view. The house built by another man is
gone?what someone else has constructed from scripture?is gone and no longer
influences your view in retrospect.
The kitchen
looks the same because you will be using the same raw material (scripture) but,
in retrospect, will see (understand) differently.
It was night?in
the darkness of your understanding, you saw two moons, whereas before, you had
only seen one. You had accepted one and rejected the other because
you were blind to it.
Your wife does
not speak, but obeys your instruction to look. Your form of
expression?the one you have chosen to bring forth your meaning waits for your
interpretation rather than offering one.
The two moons
are reflections (witnesses) of the sun (Son) (Jesus said ?the scriptures speak
of me?). They drop below the horizon?the lower, least acceptable
first. By rejecting one, you, unwittingly, reject the
other.
The moons were
black (no reflection of light) but ringed with amber?gold?righteousness. What you do not understand and are predisposed to reject as unnatural or
not good, you are to look for the good in it so that you can judge it
righteously. In the past, you could not see the reflection of
truth (Jesus, the Son-sun) in everything. As you do this, you will
come to see as God sees and declare all things good and declare as Jesus did,
?neither do I condemn thee?.
The dark of the
moon will all become amber?two golden orbs?eyes?cherubs?angels,
messengers?.witnesses.
Simply, you are
in for a major revelation that is awesome. You will be able to
look back and see how it has been in the making for a long
time.
I do not think
the dream is limited to you. I think it coincides with another
interpretation of a dream which was not posted. The dreamer?s own
interpretation was based on a preconception and/or predisposition of a public
figure. Since my post did not affirm this forum?s adoration of
that figure, I provided urls to substantiate the opposition.