Matt (2 May 2007)
"re: Bill Petrovic "This cannot be true!" (Lucifer)"


http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/may2007/billp51-2.htm

re: Isaiah 14:12

It is worse than just removing the name, they substitute for the name a
title of Jesus Christ. So when the new Bibles say the "day star" gets
thrown into hell they are actually saying that Jesus Christ gets cast
into hell. (2 Peter 1:19, Rev. 2:28, and Rev. 22:16)  Alternatively they
are saying that Jesus is Lucifer. Either way, it's blasphemy.

The Hebrew word for star is "kochba" and its not found any where in the
verse. The new Bibles just add that word "star" without any basis for
doing so. The word "Lucifer" (i.e., combine Latin roots for light/lucid
and carry/ferry - or light-bearer, from the Hebrew word helel meaning
"shiny one") in this verse has been bitterly opposed by the Freemasons
as well - for obvious reason. They worship Lucifer and don't want to
read that he gets knocked out of heaven and put into hell. Freemasons
have a date system "AL" instead of "AD" - year of Lucifer instead of
year of our Lord. Why would God give us a Bible that contains something
blasphemous? Obviously he wouldn't. Therefore those new Bibles are not
good.

Explanation here:

http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/lucifer.asp

Result - The King James Bible wins again.