Tim McHyde
(11
May 2005)
"Is the Mark of the Beast
666 or 616?"
Several people
have asked me about this one. Until there is some good textual criticism
on the manuscript fragments having 616 for Revelation 13:18, my thoughts
on the topic are as follows:
1.
One thing that would settle this would be if a man appeared on the scene
fulfilling everything else for the "First Beast from the Sea" in
Revelation 13 and other prophecies related to what is erroneously called
the Antichrist. If we "calculated" the "number of his name" as instructed
and it came to either 616 or 666 we would have our answer. There
is such a man. Prince Charles of Wales' heraldic achievement (coat-of-arms)
literally consists of the very beasts described in Rev 13 and Dan 7, he
is a Prince (Dan 9:27) and he is from the old Roman Empire that destroyed
the Temple (Dan 9:27). And rather than adding up to 616, his name
adds up to 666 using the ancient gematria system not only in its
native English but also the official Hebrew transliteration (Nasich
Charles Mem Wales), against all statistical odds.
2.
The Book of Revelation introduces very little new and tends to mostly expand
on concepts or symbols that have already been used elsewhere in the Bible.
It is noteworthy therefore that 616 appears nowhere else in the Bible while
666 appears four times, very interestingly in this verse related to another
exalted and adored king, one whom no doubt the coming Antichrist will want
to emulate in many ways.
1
Kings 10:14 (NIV) -- The
weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was 666 talents,
-Tim
http://www.EscapeAllTheseThings.com