Dear Doves,

I am becoming more certain that one of two scenarios will take place before the year is out. Both lead to the same results.

1 - the rapture will happen before the election; Kerry will be elected. The US military (greatly disseminated by the rapture) will hightail it home from all its foreign engagements. The US economy will collapse. Marshall law will be instituted to squash the resulting panic, chaos, and anarchy and to ward off terrorist attacks. The US will no longer be a player on the world scene.With Israel no longer protected by a superpower, the war of Gog and Magog will take place. 'Eurabia' will make a peace treaty with Israel and the world will be lulled into a false sense of peace.

2 - Bush will be re-elected; the enemy within (the US) will continue to undermine the war on terror thereby encouraging the entire Middle East  to erupt into violence; the rapture will take place next year. The US military (greatly disseminated by the rapture) will hightail it home from all its foreign engagements. The US economy will collapse. Marshall law will be instituted to squash the resulting panic, chaos, and anarchy and to ward off terrorist attacks. The US will no longer be a player on the world scene. With Israel no longer protected by a superpower, the war of Gog and Magog will take place. 'Eurabia' will make a peace treaty with Israel and the world will be lulled into a false sense of peace.

Blessings,

Marie Komar
 
 

The Omega Letter Intelligence Digest

Vol: 32 Issue: 19 - Wednesday, May 19, 2004 - Plain Text

Losing Iraq
by Jack Kinsella

In only six weeks, the United States intends to hand over sovereignty to a
new Iraqi government. Moreover, should that new Iraqi government ask the
United States to pick up their marbles and go home, the White House has
said it will do exactly that, no questions asked.

On the other hand, the titular president of Iraq, Iraqi Governing Council
head Issedin Salim, was blown up AT THE GATES of occupation headquarters.
What kind of country are we handing back to the Iraqis?

"We could not imagine the deterioration leading to such a point. It's
getting worse day after day, and no one has been able to put an end to it.
Who is going to protect the next government, no matter what kind it is?"
said Abdul Jalil Mohsen, a former Iraqi general and member of the Iraqi
National Accord, a prominent party represented on the U.S.-appointed
Governing Council, which Salim headed this month under a rotating system.

Central Iraq, home to a long-running revolt by Sunni Muslims, is plagued
by daily roadside bombings, occasional car bombings and frequent
assassinations of Iraqis working with the U.S.-led administration.

To the south, frequent clashes over the past six weeks have pitted U.S.
and allied forces against a persistent insurgency led by Shiite Muslim
cleric Moqtada Sadr. Fighting has all but paralyzed several southern
cities.

Hostile bands operate freely in cities that straddle the main routes in
and out of Baghdad. Foreigners who travel Iraqi roads run the risk of
being kidnapped, and reconstruction projects in many parts of the country
have come to a standstill.

Car bombs have been used repeatedly with devastating effect in Baghdad and
other parts of the country since August, when the first of them destroyed
the Jordanian Embassy. Since then, targets have included the U.N.
headquarters, Red Cross headquarters, several police stations and two
entrances to the Green Zone.

"There's no question: "A small band of people can paralyze the country,"
said Mahmoud Othman, an independent Kurdish member of the council. "They
are armed and organized and this is the difficulty."

Assessment:

There is a growing perception that America is losing in Iraq, and, as a
consequence, it is becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.

The partisans that put the quest for personal power ahead of patriotism
(we know who they are) have managed to recreate Vietnam by the simple
expedient of repeating it in connection with Iraq as often as possible.

You aren't hearing "No more Vietnams" being chanted by supporters of the
administration.  Why? Because they REALLY don't want another Vietnam,
unlike the useful idiots being used by all sides interested in bring down
the current administration.  To them, another Vietnam means another
Richard Nixon, and that translates into another shot at power.

It is an irony of history that the North Vietnamese were actually defeated
during the Tet Offensive, but,  with the resignation of Richard Nixon, the
Democrats in Congress gave the South over to the Communist North. (Where
today, Vietnamese Christians are routinely tortured in an effort to make
them renounce Christ)

Iraq is no Vietnam.  In Vietnam, America fought a guerilla war, but it was
against an organized military force under the command of the North
Vietnamese Army numbering in the millions.

In Iraq, we are fighting a guerilla war against  disorganized,
unidentifiable individuals, loosely affiliated into an insurgency movement
numbering in the thousands. And one in ten of THEM is a foreign al-Qaeda
fighter.

Iraq is a roughly equivalent in size and population to the State of
California. If all the gang members in California came together into a
loosely affiliated insurgency movement like that in Iraq, California would
look very much like Iraq.

The killings, bombings, shootings and terror  would overwhelm even the
well-equipped, experienced and highly-trained Calfornia law enforcement
community.  The National Guard would also most certainly be deployed.

Picture the terror and confusion that would follow the terrorist killings
of a dozen, or a hundred, or a thousand Californians in an ever-escalating
series of attacks by a relative handful of dedicated gangs of insurgents.

Now, imagine the other forty-nine states wringing their hands as they
debate whether or not to declare California 'lost' to the gangs and begin
discussing ways to turn Sacramento over to the gang leaders?

Not because we CAN'T take it back, but because taking it back might hurt
one party's chances to seize power in the next election?

It is of critical importance to homeland security that the terrorists
lose -- and lose large -- in Iraq.  The only way to defeat terror is to
make it unprofitable.

We tend to think of war in decisive terms.  Historically, wars turn on
major battles. The terrorists views things exactly the opposite.  The
terrorist doesn't need a decisive military victory to acheive his goal,
since his goal is to create terror and win by threat what he could never
win by force.

America's own politicians, aided by the mainstream liberal media and the
useful idiots who can't see what is at stake, are handing victory after
victory to our enemies, hoping a decisive enemy victory in Iraq will mean
a decisive political victory in November.

In the last days, the Bible says the world is divided up into four spheres
of global influence.  The revived Roman Empire, headed by the antichrist,
the Kings of the East (who field an army of two hundred million)  the
Kings of the South, and the Gog-Magog Alliance.

All four exist in one form or another already. But there is no mention of
a fifth, overarching superpower remotely resembling the modern United
States in the last days.

"For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and
there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers
places. Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill
you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for My Name's sake."

"And then shall many BE OFFENDED, and shall BETRAY one another, and shall
HATE one another. And many false prophets shall rise, and SHALL DECIEVE
MANY. And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold."
(Matthew 24:7-12)

"So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near,
even at the doors. Verily I say unto you, THIS GENERATION SHALL NOT PASS,
till all these things be fulfilled." (Matthew 24:33-34)