On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger,
associate professor of criminology at the University of
Houston, Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique
is “becoming the cutting edge of forensic science.”
“Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents
in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his
‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the
lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution to law
enforcement tools used by criminal investigators,” wrote
Egger.
Hodges is not new to the field, already having
identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails,
letters and police interviews to spot secret
confessions. He decoded Simpson’s “suicide note” to
confirm Simpson had committed a double murder. He
deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note in Boulder,
Colo., to identify the child’s killer. He decrypted
letters from BTK to predict that he was about to kill
again – the only profiler to do so. He studied
statements by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe to
tie them to the slaying of Holloway. He showed how Casey
Anthony secretly confessed to killing her daughter in
200 letters written to a jail mate. He even decoded Bill
Clinton’s comments about Monica Lewinsky.
In his newest analysis, he looks further into
Obama’s statements in his press conference about the
sequester issue in which he berated Republicans for not
doing what he wants.
Hodges said “another spontaneous image” appeared
from Obama’s “super intelligence.”
“Asked whether he couldn’t have pushed
negotiations until a deal was reached, Obama replied, ‘I
can’t have Secret Service block the doorway,’” Hodges
explained
“He suggests the secret wish to block the
Republicans from the door to the government. Failing to
negotiate, he has made every effort to demonize/crush
Republicans to gain total control of the
government after the 2014 election. His ‘have
Secret Service’ image further suggests a
desire to totally control major government law
enforcement agencies– to block any opposition,”
Hodges said.
“The frightening image ‘of blocking the doorway’
to those who oppose him suggests progressively ideas of
imprisonment/forced containment, and a
picture of martial law. Extreme? Likely so for
now but equally a potential major warning of his true
intent – if everything fell into place,” he said.
But Hodges noted objective actions that fit the
pattern, such as the government’s purchase of 1.6
billion rounds of ammunition, the estimated 145,000
federal agents with firearm- carry authority and the
65,000 agents for the Department of Homeland Security
alone.
Then, he said, there’s the report that a
Minnesota company was selling to the federal government
cutout targets “designed to ‘desensitize police’ to
‘nontraditional threat targets.”
The targets included pregnant women, children,
older people and other civilians in neighborhood
settings – all holding guns. The company reported law
enforcement designed and ordered the targets.
“In your wildest imagination, who in law
enforcement needs desensitization to such targets?
Hodges noted that even activists on the left
have expressed concern. Medea Benjamin, co-founder of
the left-wing Code Pink, in a recent WABC radio
interview with host Aaron Klein, called the potential
abuse by the Obama administration’s huge domestic police
power “extremely troubling.”
“Recall Obama’s earlier words which,
importantly, he made spontaneously, strongly pointing
toward an unconscious confession. ‘We’ve got to have
a civilian national security force that’s just as
powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the
military].’
“What exactly was he thinking and why?
Undeniably this was extreme: a civilian force just as
well funded and strong as our military – implying
majorly armed. The question is what exactly was Obama
secretly confessing about his future plans? His
unconscious super intelligence suggests a warning from a
very dangerous Obama,” Hodges contends.
The violent imagery Obama used in his first
inaugural stunned Hodges. He cited “sacrifices borne
by our ancestors,” “perils we can scarcely imagine,”
“stained with blood,” “earlier generations faced down
fascism …with missiles and tanks … and enduring
convictions.”
And Obama’s references to “leaders” include:
“those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror
and slaughtering innocents,” “leaders … who seek to sow
conflict, or blame their … ills on the West” and “the
oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging
storms.”
“As always, Obama’s super intelligence (guided
by a deeper moral compass) suggests ways to stand up to
him and the danger he presents,” Hodges wrote, quoting,
“Work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat, and roll
back the specter of a warming planet.”
The profiler said Obama’s behavior “shouts at
us.”
“The background of murderous drone attacks he
personally took delight in supervising – a
suggestion of just how furious he is,” he wrote, noting
Obama’s “pattern” of weakening the U.S. militarily and
citizens individually by cutting budgets and restricting
gun rights.
“Throw into the mix the seemingly extreme idea
of using drones on the American people but still a
possibility and we have yet another issue of war against
the citizens,” Hodges said.
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., staged a nearly 13-hour
filibuster because the administration refused to confirm
for him that Americans on U.S. soil would not be killed
by Obama-ordered drone strikes.
“Remember, too, Obama was an Alinsky trainer.
And Alinsky’s motto was “trick” – deception from within
– followed by revolution and social chaos,” Hodges said.
“One thing we can say for certain is that America
is in a very precarious place. And such an
angry wounded president arming a civilian force to the
maximum when speaking of an apocalypse, evil on the
horizon and a dictator president – along with his need
to control law enforcement – presents an
extreme warning.”
“He suggested the idea, ‘I should somehow do a
‘Jedi mind-meld’ with these folks [Republicans] and
convince them to do what’s right.’ He used a mixed image
from two sci-fi shows,” Hodges explained. “First he
alluded to a Jedi ‘mind trick’ used on weak-minded foes
(‘Star Wars’ films) implying his continued mind games
to trick subservient foolish Americans.
“His spontaneous ‘Star Wars’ image also
references his war on the Republicans – efforts to
discredit them so that he can affect the next election
and control both houses of Congress in his dictatorial
behavior. (He also suggests his war on the military – to
weaken it.)
“Finally he implies in the ‘mind-meld’ technique
he’s opening his unconscious mind up and we can read it
if we know how – just as Commander Spock in ‘Star Trek’
would let others read his mind to provide them with
special insightful messages,” he said.
He suggested Obama has been exaggerating the
impact of the sequester to “unconsciously paint a true
picture of his overall destructive plan.”
“His super intelligence looks into the future
and sees the result of his plans long-term,” Hodges
said.
“Middle-class families will ‘have their lives
disrupted in significant ways.’ He predicts that
Americans one day will know the economy didn’t have to
suffer if bad decisions (his) had been averted. We ask
which does greater damage: a 2 percent budget cut or his
obvious long-term plan of crippling rising debt and
increased taxes?”
Hodges also suggested Obama is revealing
a coming “apocalypse” by saying, “There’s not going to
be an apocalypse.”
“When he wonders (regarding Republicans) if he
could do something else ‘to make these guys not paint
horns on my head’ we indeed should be frightened
beyond belief. He suggests America is in for
a devil of a time to put it mildly – that deep down he
harbors evil intentions,” Hodges said.