Dear Doves,
Nor the Desire OF Women
In looking at the wording of the Bible statement, “nor the desire of women”, Bruce Warner correctly noted a subtlety that many seasoned prophecy experts have never picked up on. Specifically, the use of the words “OF women” and not the words “for women” in Daniel 11:37, which states,”He shall regard neither the God of his fathers nor the desire of women”:
http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/march2012/brucew36-1.htm
Bruce then outlines that this means that the Anti-Christ is not necessarily a homosexual. On this part, I completely agree with Bruce. This so-called homosexual requirement is a common interpretation that I have seen MANY Bible scholars outline by mistake. The Bible neither indicates that the Anti-Christ cannot be a homosexual nor that the Anti-Christ has to be one. Put another way, the Anti-Christ may or may not be a homosexual.
With that, let us tie this information with what we already know. While Obama certainly doesn’t APPEAR to be a homosexual, can we REALLY know!! After all, only the Lord truly knows the heart of man!! Either way, there is no Scriptural requirement for Obama to be straight or gay.
However, it is the second part of Bruce’s interpretation that I take issue with. After excluding a homosexuality requirement, Bruce goes on to interpret this verse to mean the following:
“I take (this verse) to mean that he has no regard for the maternal desire of women for motherhood. The woman he may be with, whether he is married or not, will be childless. He will not father any children.”
This is an incorrect statement!! Even before Obama appeared on the world scene, I still would have disagreed with Bruce’s statement that this verse be interpreted as the Anti-Christ being required to be childless. While I would have agreed that this verse MAY indicate that the Anti-Christ would be childless, I certainly do not see childlessness as being a requirement.
However, now that we know that Obama is the Anti-Christ, my disagreement with Bruce’s interpretation is now EXTREMELY urgent!! Now that we know that Obama is the Anti-Christ AND has his own children, Bruce’s definitive statement indicating that the Anti-Christ “will not father any children” becomes not only misleading, but EXTREMELY dangerous!! This would incorrectly exclude the true Anti-Christ, Obama from contention. A man that not only dwells among us today, but also has his finger on a button that could launch 100s of nuclear weapons!!
So what is an alternative possible interpretation? In order to answer this, please allow me to present a simple and logical alternative interpretation that easily fits in PERFECTLY with President Obama’s background. We will start off with a quick quiz:
- What religion cares the very least about women’s rights?
- What religion cheers a man on as he throws acid on a woman’s face as punishment for not covering up as much as he thought she should?
- What religion encourages a husband to beat his wife violently if he, and he alone, determines that she is being disobedient (or whatever crime he has determined she has done)?
If you answered, “the religion of Islam” to all three of the above questions, you would be 100% correct!
Is Obama a Muslim? YES!! Until Obama becomes indwelt by Satan, he continues to be a Muslim-in-secret. If you waddle, swim, fly, look and sound like a duck, you’re a duck.
As such, this means that, by definition, Obama also believes the Islamic teachings on women. Therefore, to Obama, women are chattel, a possession like a couch or car, and therefore vastly inferior to men!! Obama may pretend to be compassionate on women’s issues because he currently has to, but his father’s teachings will eventually come to the forefront at crunch time. ESPECIALLY when his true father, Satan, fully possesses Obama for his final 1260 days on earth!!
Bottom line: Why would a Muslim, such as Obama, ever have any other viewpoint than not caring one iota for what a women desires? NEVER!!
Does the fact that Obama has children change this perspective? Absolutely not!!
Having a personal desire to have an off-spring for self-centered reasons is VERY common in the Muslim world. The women is just an incubator to the vast majority of the men in this religion of hate and despair.
Having a child with a woman does not mean that the man actually HAS to care even one little bit about her desire(s). Oh sure, one could act like they cared, like Obama pretends to care about his wife in public (again, this is REQUIRED for now), but only God TRULY knows the state of Obama’s heart towards women. And if God says that the Anti-Christ won’t regard the desire of women, that means that Obama’s public displays of affection for Michelle is just that – AN ACT, A DISPLAY – to fool the people into following him!!
CONCLUSION: By applying Bruce’s incorrect interpretation of this verse would require the exclusion of every single person that had children from Anti-Christ contention. In turn, this could cause someone from not seeing President Obama for who he is – the Anti-Christ!! This is very dangerous indeed!!
Now, on to the second part of this post:
Ten Days of Tribulation
Bruce’s interpretation of the Church having to endure ten days of tribulation is also incorrect. The ten days Bruce is referring to was completely fulfilled by the 2nd & 3rd century church. The ten days are symbolic of the persecution of EXACTLY TEN Roman Caesars that this church had to endure over a subsequent 250 year period.
However, for those out there that are convinced that the Bride will be taken out of the Great Tribulation, the following POSSIBLE interpretation is the only one that will satisfy me:
- The nuclear missiles (or other method of mass destruction) being launched will signify the beginning of the Great Tribulation
- While the nukes are in the air, but before they explode, we are Raptured
- AFTER our departure, the nukes detonate (the Sudden Destruction)
The launching of the nukes (or other method) will start the Great Tribulation. The Great Tribulation will include a lead-in period that proceeds the 1260 day reign of the Anti-Christ. This trigger event, and at least some further lead up time (now no more than 35 days), will be required to pave the way for this crowning of Obama. Based on this, one could say that Bride had been taken “out of great tribulation”.
However, it is important to note that we would not have suffered ANY of the tribulation calamities.
Alternatively, being stuck on watching for a ten-day lead in, when in fact the Rapture event that could happen any second, including NOW, is yet another EXTREMELY dangerous interpretation!!
Keep looking up, my brothers and sisters in Christ. Our redemption SURELY draws near!! What exciting times to be living in!!
YbiC, MathMan