Connecting the British Dots .......

An Armada of ships from 10 Foreign nations stretching from Maine to Texas

Eighteen warships [ from the UK ] , led by Fleet flagship HMS Invincible, are taking part in Exercise Aurora, stretching along the eastern seaboard of the United States to the Gulf of Mexico.
[ Gulf of Mexico stretches all the way to Texas ]

Among the ships deployed are helicopter carrier HMS Ocean, assault ship HMS Albion and Type 23 frigates HM ships Marlborough and Sutherland, all sailing in small ‘packets’ to meet up in Norfolk, Virginia.

The linchpin of the deployment is Exercise Rapid Alliance, involving two American carrier battlegroups and a US Marine Corps task force, staging mock invasions.

Also joining the war games are ships and personnel from Canada, Holland, Germany, Peru, Norway, Italy, Denmark, France and Australia.
 

http://www.navynews.co.uk/articles/2004/0405/0004052601.asp _______________________   In my other post , it was stated that our USS Carrier ships were leaving our East Coast. Connecting the dots, it appears that this is being done to make way for the British ships patrolling  (  called "exercises" ) off our Eastern Seaboard. While admittedly our American battleships that are being deployed now around the world are more than capable of enforcing democracy through superior strength, there appears to be another reason altogether for the assemblage of foreign forces off of our Eastern and  SouthEastern Coasts. These 10 foreign forces ( UK, Canada, Australia, France, Holland, Italy, Germany, Norway, Denmark and Peru ) are not particularly noted for superior strength in global causes. The first three countries are the UK, Canada and Australia which of course speak English and would fare well in regards to "protecting" an English-speaking nation such as the USA. Now we notice that these ships are prepared with helicopters, which is the staple of urban-warfare. Also, these ships come in small contingencies ( "packets" ) with perhaps regional expertise. ___________________   But the real clincher for connecting dots is this one: Coup d'etat by stroke of pen. The British have finally won the War of Revolution ( Independence). Hello ? Is anyone running OUR government ???? American Constitution abolished ( just in time for the EU Constitution to take over). July 4th wiped out by April 19th ? Critics say a new anti-terrorism treaty between the U.S. and the United Kingdom could conceivably result in Great Britain seizing the assets of dead enemies – like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams.  The treaty, forwarded April 19, 2004, by President Bush to the U.S. Senate for ratification, has generated little media attention and little controversy – probably due to the fact that it is an agreement between coalition partners in the war on terrorism. Drafted by Attorney General John Ashcroft, the treaty is designed for "combatting terrorism, organized crime, money laundering, and other offenses." But William Hughes, author of "Saying 'No' to the War Party," charges that under the treaty as written, the British could demand recompense from anyone in the U.S. who stood up to British law – living or dead. Another critic, Professor Francis A. Boyle, a professor of international law at the University of Illinois, claims the treaty will "eliminate the political offense exception to any offense allegedly involving violence or weapons; transfer responsibility for determining whether the extradition request is politically motivated  from the courts to the executive branch;  allow for extradition even if no U.S. federal law is violated;  and allow for provisional arrest and detention for 60 days upon request by the UK."  * * * * * * * * * Hughes states: "If all of this sounds like the Brits could wake up one morning and just arbitrarily charge an American citizen with a so-called 'extraditable offense,' on the flimsiest kind of evidence, you're right to think so.  It also means that the accused, a citizen of this republic, would get no full judicial review of his extradition process by a federal judge, a federal appellant court, or the U.S. Supreme Court." He says once the treaty is approved by the Senate and signed by the president, "an American, will be at the mercy of an alien-based foreign government" with none of the usual constitutional protections. The treaty is currently sitting before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, chaired by Sen. Richard G. Lugar, * * * * * * * * * Boyle has written Lugar instructing him that had the treaty been in force back in the 1770s, America's founding fathers, including Washington and Jefferson, would have been "extradited to the British Crown for prosecution of their very revolutionary activities that founded the United States of America itself."  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38555 So, our military is leaving our East Coast and Foreign Forces are replacing them, spearheaded by the British who have legal jurisdiction over each American citizen. Something to think about. 8 of the 10 forces belong to NATO. www.nato.int/structur/countries.htm Australia belongs to ANZUS http://usembassy-australia.state.gov/anzus/ http://216.239.53.104/search?q=cache:_0oQDRuxg3MJ:www.australianpolitics.com/foreign/anzus/+ANZUS&hl=en and Peru and the US share military assistance concerning human rights "since the 1970s the United States has provided Peru with military assistance for counternarcotics operations.  U.S. relations with Peru have been strained in recent years due to concerns over human rights abuses" http://www.fas.org/asmp/profiles/peru.htm