Steve Coerper (25 Jan 2015)
"Sackcloth sun and blood moon"
Dear John and all -
Much has recently been made of the lunar tetrads but a quick
search of the scriptures shows that there is no "match" between
lunar eclipses on feast days and any signs the Lord told us to
watch for. The sole appearances of "blood moons" occur in Joel
2, Acts 2 (Peter quoting Joel), and Revelation 6.
In Joel 2/Acts 2 the Lord tells us of a specific sign that will
precede the Day of the Lord. That sign is NOT a tetrad of blood
moons. It is, rather, a sun turned to darkness (total solar
eclipse) followed by a blood moon (total lunar eclipse).
THAT IS THE SIGN! And as most of you probably know, there will
be a total solar eclipse on March 20th followed by a total lunar
eclipse on April 4th. What you may not know is how rare this
is: according to research done by Renee Moses and Paul Begley,
this is the ONLY time this sign occurs in the timeframe they
investigated, which was from 1000 BC to 3000 AD.
I think a lot of the "tetrad" and "shemitah" discussion
is distraction and may lead some people to miss the sign.
It is later than many of us think. Remember, the sign is
not for us: it's for the Jews. It's certainly possible and
not inconsistent with scripture for us to be gathered before
the sign happens.
It's been suggested that the sun could be darkened by huge
amounts of volcanic ash and similar debris, and that since we
don't know when all the volcanoes may blow and create this
condition, we won't know the day of the sign beforehand. I
would suggest that the required amount of volcanic or nuclear
activity to darken the sun would not be a sign that the Day of
the Lord was coming, but rather that the Day of the Lord had
arrived. This, I believe, is what is in view in Revelation 6,
as the text explicitly states.
For this reason, I'm strongly inclined to believe that this is
I discussed this more extensively on a recent podcast, linked
Hope to see you soon.