Rickey (19
Jan
2012)
""ONE OF""
Please read the following 2 example statements.
(Example 1)If a news reporter said, “one of the boats in the
harbor sank”. The way he worded his statement implies that there
was more than one boat in the harbor because he said “one of the
boats”.
(Example 2) Suppose a friend tells you “one of the trees on my
property died”. The way he or she worded their statement,
implies that there was more than one tree on the property.
Now I want to make my point. First, I do acknowledge that
everyone makes grammatical errors all the time. But when someone
says “one of”, that implies that there is or was more than one.
Now let us examine Revelation 13 verse 3 from the KJV. “And I
saw one of his heads as if it were wounded to death; and his
deadly wound was healed: and all the world marveled after the
beast”.
Notice it reads “one of his heads”. Unless the Antichrist has
more than one head on his shoulders, this can not be talking
about his physical body. We are reading the word of God where
every single word is extremely specific and important to the
verse.
Many people (including ministers) teach that the Antichrist will
receive a deadly wound to his head, possibly a gun shot or
something, but then he miraculously recovers. Clearly that is
not what this verse is saying!