K.S. Rajan (9
Jan 2012)
"Obama Puts His Stamp
on Strategy for a Leaner Military"
"In an unusual appearance at the Pentagon briefing room on
Thursday, Mr. Obama outlined a new national defense strategy
[...]"
"Pentagon officials made it clear that the department’s
priorities in coming years would be financing for defense and
offense in cyberspace, for Special Operations forces and for the
broad area of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.
From yesterday's NYT, FYI,
David
News Analysis
Obama Puts His Stamp on Strategy for a Leaner Military
Doug Mills/The New York Times
President Obama after speaking about military strategy at the
Pentagon on Thursday.
By ELISABETH BUMILLER and THOM SHANKER
Published: January 5, 2012
WASHINGTON — President Obama has for the first time put his own
stamp on an all-encompassing American military policy by turning
from the grinding ground wars that he inherited from the Bush
administration and refocusing on what he described as a smaller,
more agile force across Asia, the Pacific and the Middle East.
In an unusual appearance at the Pentagon briefing room on
Thursday, Mr. Obama outlined a new national defense strategy
driven by three realities: the winding down of a decade of war
in Iraq and Afghanistan, a fiscal crisis demanding hundreds of
billions of dollars in Pentagon budget cuts and a rising threat
from China and Iran.
A fourth reality, not mentioned in the briefing room, was Mr.
Obama’s re-election campaign and the chorus of Republican
presidential candidates who have sought to portray him as
decimating the Pentagon budget and being weak in his response to
Iran.
Mr. Obama, who spoke surrounded by a tableau of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff in dress uniforms and with chests full of medals,
underscored the national security successes of his
administration — the ending of the Iraq war, the killing of
Osama bin Laden and the ouster of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi of
Libya — before declaring that the United States would downsize
to a smaller ground force, get rid of “outdated cold war-era
systems” and step up investments in intelligence-gathering and
cyberwarfare.
He also said, in what seemed aimed at the Republicans as well as
the Defense Department officials in the room, that “our military
will be leaner, but the world must know the United States is
going to maintain our military superiority.”
Despite the pageantry, many elements of the new strategy had a
“back to the future” quality and echoed the goals of a smaller
but more technically proficient military advanced by Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld before the Sept. 11 attacks. Those
plans were soon overtaken by the need to build up ground forces
for the kind of conventional wars that the Pentagon had not
envisioned a decade ago.
“Conventionally it makes perfect sense to avoid fighting
worst-case wars,” said Anthony H. Cordesman, a military analyst
at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “But the
20th century, and even the 21st century, is a warning about how
well anybody can do long-term forecasting. I have listened for
decades to, ‘This time we’re going to be more efficient, this
time we’re going to use technology.’ ”
Pentagon officials acknowledged the risks in a strategy that
declares that American ground forces will no longer be large
enough to conduct prolonged, large-scale counterinsurgency
campaigns like those in Iraq and Afghanistan — Defense Secretary
Leon E. Panetta has said the Army must shrink to 490,000
soldiers over the next decade, from 570,000 — and so said they
were prepared to change course if required.
In a briefing after Mr. Obama’s remarks, Adm. James A. Winnefeld
Jr., the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the
new strategy embraced “reversibility” that would allow the
Pentagon to avoid “departmental hubris.” In other words, the
Defense Department would begin a slow build-down of the Army
that could be reversed and, in a national security emergency, it
could order up a massive mobilization of the National Guard and
Reserves.
Other analysts said the strategy appeared good but that without
the details — specifically, what kind of budget cuts it would
result in — it was hard to judge. The specific cuts are to be
made public in coming weeks.
“It’s kind of an incomplete,” said Andrew F. Krepinevich Jr., a
military expert at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessments. “It’s like when you jump out of an aircraft with a
parachute, the first five seconds are ‘so far, so good.’ But
you’re still waiting for the chute to open.”
White House and Pentagon officials said that Mr. Obama spent a
substantial amount of time with military officials on the new
strategy, which they defined as six meetings he had on the
strategy with military leaders and regional commanders between
September and late December. Although other presidents have been
deeply immersed in military policy, for Mr. Obama the time
commitment appears to signal an interest in a policy that turns
the page from President George W. Bush’s wars.
“Certainly it indicates a level of interest on the president’s
part, over and above what we’ve seen from him before,” Mr.
Krepinevich said.
The new strategy document finally defines away the Defense
Department’s historic requirement to have the ability to fight
and win two wars at once — a measure that one official said “has
been on life-support for years.”
The strategy released under Mr. Obama in 2010 said the military
was responsible for “maintaining the ability to prevail against
two capable nation-state aggressors.”
In contrast, the strategy released Thursday said the military
must be able to fight one war, but is responsible only for
“denying the objectives of — or imposing unacceptable costs on —
an opportunistic aggressor in a second region.”
Senior Pentagon officials said that viewing military
requirements through something as static as the two-war model
had become outdated, and that the true measurement was whether
the Pentagon could field a force capable of carrying out a wide
range of military actions to protect the nation’s interests.
Pentagon officials made it clear that the department’s
priorities in coming years would be financing for defense and
offense in cyberspace, for Special Operations forces and for the
broad area of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.
A version of this article appeared in print on January 6, 2012,
on page A18 of the New York edition with the headline: A
Strategy for a Leaner Military, With Obama Taking the Lead.