Friday, January 27, 2012
Presidential Deception--Above the law, below the radar

The man who occupies the Oval Office ignored a court order on January 26, thereby breaking the law. He was ordered to attend an Administrative Court hearing in Atlanta, Georgia concerning whether he is eligible to be on the Georgia ballot as a candidate. The president's legal council wrote a letter to Brian Kemp, Georgia's Secretary of State, advising that his client and battery of lawyers will "suspend" participation in the hearing. The hearing took place as scheduled in a packed Atlanta courtroom with the defendant's table empty. There was a small story on Drudge Report giving few details of the hearing. In this case, and others, the president is above the law, and below the radar of the public.

Kemp wrote the president's council: "In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneitìcial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril." At the hearing, it appeared that the president had submitted no information for the record.

The hearing was streamed live on the internet. It was difficult to hear witness introductions, etc., and there appears to be no mainstream media having any detailed reports. Sources at the scene report that the judge called plaintiff council into his chamber and wanted to issue a default judgment against the president. Council argued in favor of holding the hearing to place the testimonies into court records. The testimonies from various experts demonstrated three main points: 1) that the man holding the office of president is not a natural born citizen, 2) his identity is in question because his social security number is fraudulent, and 3) his birth certificate is a high tech forgery. There was no rebuttal by the defendant.

The testimonies gave detailed information that cast tremendous doubt on the president's identity, his citizenship, and conflicting information he has provided. They were professional and compelling, and now they are a matter of court record--even if the news media will not report them. Whether the president wants to recognize there is a question about his eligibility, he is defiantly stonewalling the process. Any other American citizen who refused to obey a court order would be held in contempt and perhaps jailed. The news media, given its freedom of speech, is abrogating this essential duty to a free society by not covering it. Jesus said in Matthew 24:4, "Take heed that no man deceive you." Deception abounds as it appears above the law and below the radar.

Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson