K.S. Rajan (17
Jan 2012)
"report by JIM
FLETCHER"
Iranian Plans Going Up In Smoke
Those who have been expecting a big, splashy, dangerous Israeli
airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities…may never see it.
This past week’s killing of key Iranian nuclear scientist
Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan, 32, is one of a quiet number of such
assassinations. Ahmadi-Roshan was killed when a pair of
motorcyclists attached a magnetic car bomb on the underside of
his car, then sped away.
The Iranians have accused both the U.S. and Israel of being
involved, and there was a telling bit in the Jerusalem Post on
Thursday:
“Iranian officials implicated Israel and the US in the attack,
but the US denied the charges.”
Notice the sentence didn’t end with: “…but the US and Israel
denied the charges.”
Most thinking people realize the Israelis might be involved.
Their feared Mossad boasts an elite team of assassins who strike
without warning, then seemingly vaporize.
The sudden death of a major figure in Iran’s race for nuclear
weapons comes in the middle of negotiations in Jordan between
Israelis and Palestinians, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and Barack Obama also discussed the situation by phone.
Everyone understands the tremendous danger that Iran poses not
only to the region, but globally, since they are the world’s
biggest sponsor of state terrorism. Further in the JPost report,
we read:
“An senior Iranian security official warned that Iran had a
cross-border, cross-regional strategy for responding to the
attack.”
Normally, when an Islamic state or terror group threatens to
“burn the sand under the feet of the invaders,” they are merely
playing up the stereotype of the emotional dictator who is more
paper tiger than angel of death.
Yet, the Iranians do have the capacity to wage war in the form
of these “cross regional” strategies. And were they able to
succeed in striking Israel, the latter is too small to absorb
such a lethal blow.
In 1950, the United States had 299 warheads. By 1987, we had
accumulated a peak of 13,173 (the Soviets had 10,442)! What
became known as M.A.D.—Mutual Assured Destruction—was the key in
neither country striking. They were rational. And, if various
accounts can be believed, Bobby Kennedy’s whisper into the ear
of his Soviet counterpart—an appeal to reason—worked.
This scenario doesn’t exist with the Iranians. In a German
report that appeared several years ago, the situation was
described perfectly:
“The Arab/Iranian totalitarian leaderships’ attitudes, difficult
for the West to fathom, are aggressive, egomaniacal, suspicious
and reckless no less than intelligent.”
In other words, the Iranians are truly trigger-happy.
In the ‘60s, the Egyptian air force murdered scores of people in
Yemen, using mustard gas. In 1982, Syria’s dictator, Hafez
Assad, ordered his troops to obliterate the city of Homs, using
cyanide.
Middle East dictators have never had the opportunity to murder
on a really large scale; can you imagine what would happen if
they get their hands on a lethal weapon?
In 1984, Iran began development of its chemical weapons program
and two years later, in the middle of a bitter war with Iraq,
used cyanide, phosgene, mustard gas, and tabun on the Iraqis.
The delivery systems were artillery shells, air-dropped bombs,
and rockets.
The biological weapons program began also in 1986—botulinum,
ricin, anthrax.
Most would be stunned to know that Iran’s nuclear program,
modest though it was, began in the 1950’s, under the leadership
of…the United States! This program continued with U.S.
assistance until the Iranian Revolution of 1979. The first
Iranian nuclear power plant—Bushehr I— opened on September 12,
2011. This time the Russians helped.
In the book, Ballistic Missiles (edited by Arieh Stav),
contributing writer Yoash Tsiddon-Chatto wrote:
“Whether peace or other treaties are signed or not, war will
erupt and missiles will be launched at the first sign of Israeli
weakness, whenever the huge price to be paid is considered
acceptable by the Arab leadership.”
This is a key sentence. Whenever…considered acceptable. The
dictators of the Middle East will launch an attack on Israel
(or, perhaps more likely, each other) at the moment they feel
they will not pay too high a price within the international
community.
They are getting closer, and every week that brings more weak
messages from Washington makes all of us more vulnerable. The
Iranians are not only working on missiles to obliterate Israel;
they are developing plans to strike the U.S.
Let us hope the motorcycles keep running.