Charles Holler (23 Jan 2009)
"First Oath null and void?"
Greetings John and Doves,
Why would our
President need to take the oath again? Could it be that the first one
was null and void......if not he would have just went on business as
usual. He did say his presidency would be transparent and yet a few
hours later he takes a second oath behind closed doors in the map room
in front of a small group of reporters and not the capitol platform
before the whole watching world, with no camera crews, news
photographers, regular press, and just the White House photographer and
a few of his closest aides. I didn't think much about it until I read
our local paper and how the president said he didn't have his
bible with him but it was binding anyway. He just was not going to
swear an oath on the bible was he?
Agape,
Charles Holler Sr.