K.S. Rajan (16
Feb 2012)
"Senators urged on
cyber security bill"
The US want to ensure that "Companies running computer networks
essential to US economic and national security" are better
defended "from spies, hackers and terrorists".
From today's FT, FYI,
David
February 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Senators urged on cyber security bill
By Paul Taylor in New York
Companies running computer networks essential to US economic and
national security would be required to better defend their
systems from spies, hackers and terrorists under a comprehensive
cybersecurity bill unveiled by leading senators.
The bill, drafted by senators John Rockefeller and Dianne
Feinstein, both Democrats; Susan Collins, a Republican, and Joe
Lieberman, an independent, combines elements of several
cybersecurity bills introduced over the past three years into
one measure.
Under it, the Homeland Security Department would have the power
to identify systems that could cause mass casualties or
catastrophic economic damage if attacked. The agency would then
set regulations requiring operators of critical networks to
improve security and companies would have to show that their
networks are secure or face penalties.
Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat and Senate majority leader, has
said he wants to bring the bill to the chamber’s floor for a
vote as soon as possible while the Senate Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Committee scheduled a hearing on the bill
for later this week.
Lawmakers and regulators say new rules are needed to fight more
sophisticated cyber attacks that threaten to disrupt water
supplies, power grids, banks and communications networks.
Underscoring the apparent urgency, Mr Rockefeller, who
introduced the bill on the Senate floor on Tuesday, warned: “We
are on the brink of what could be a calamity. A widespread
cyberattack could potentially be as devastating to this country
as the terror attacks that tore apart this country 10 years
ago.”
Mr Rockefeller noted hackers’ recent success in breaking into
sensitive government agencies and major companies including
several in the defence sector and warned that air traffic
control, rail switching networks and chemical pipelines could be
the next target.
“We can act now and try and prepare ourselves as best as we can,
or we can wait and we will be surprised with what happens. I’m
here to argue that we should act now,” Mr Rockefeller said.
The proposed legislation would also ease information-sharing
between the federal government and the private sector to combat
cyber crime and espionage and would require the government to
take steps to secure its own networks.
The push for cybersecurity legislation has intensified following
attacks last year on a wide range of companies including
Citigroup, the third-largest US bank by assets, and Bethesda,
Maryland-based Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest defence
company.
A report published late last year by the National
Counterintelligence Executive, an advisory panel of senior US
security officials, suggested that hackers from China and Russia
in particular are pursuing American industrial secrets,
jeopardising an estimated $398bn in US research.
But despite the scale of the potential problem, industry groups
led by the US Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s largest
business-lobbying group, have urged lawmakers to delay
consideration of the new bill and called for hearings before any
floor vote, citing concerns about added expenses for companies.
“Rushing forward with legislation that has not been fully vetted
would be a major mistake,” said Bruce Josten, the chamber’s
executive vice president of government affairs, in a letter sent
last month to Mr Reid and Mitch McConnell, the Senate minority
leader and a Kentucky Republican.
The chamber and some Republicans in the House of Representative
favour legislation that relies on incentives, rather than rules,
to improve security and have proposed less sweeping legislation
setting the stage for a congressional battle over the Senate
bill.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2012.