K.S. Rajan (14
Feb 2012)
"Traveling Light in a
Time of Digital Thievery"
Very interesting article.
Keywords: systematic cyberthieving in China, mandatory
precautions when traveling there, Mike McConnel (pictured
below).
From yesterday's NYT, FYI,
David
Traveling Light in a Time of Digital Thievery
By NICOLE PERLROTH
Published: February 10, 2012
SAN FRANCISCO — When Kenneth G. Lieberthal, a China expert at
the Brookings Institution, travels to that country, he follows a
routine that seems straight from a spy film.
Mike McConnell, former director of national intelligence, said
some of the government's computer systems had been infected.
Kenneth G. Lieberthal of the Brookings Institution takes
precautions while traveling.
He leaves his cellphone and laptop at home and instead brings
“loaner” devices, which he erases before he leaves the United
States and wipes clean the minute he returns. In China, he
disables Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, never lets his phone out of his
sight and, in meetings, not only turns off his phone but also
removes the battery, for fear his microphone could be turned on
remotely. He connects to the Internet only through an encrypted,
password-protected channel, and copies and pastes his password
from a USB thumb drive. He never types in a password directly,
because, he said, “the Chinese are very good at installing
key-logging software on your laptop.”
What might have once sounded like the behavior of a paranoid is
now standard operating procedure for officials at American
government agencies, research groups and companies that do
business in China and Russia — like Google, the State Department
and the Internet security giant McAfee. Digital espionage in
these countries, security experts say, is a real and growing
threat — whether in pursuit of confidential government
information or corporate trade secrets.
“If a company has significant intellectual property that the
Chinese and Russians are interested in, and you go over there
with mobile devices, your devices will get penetrated,” said
Joel F. Brenner, formerly the top counterintelligence official
in the office of the director of national intelligence.
Theft of trade secrets was long the work of insiders — corporate
moles or disgruntled employees. But it has become easier to
steal information remotely because of the Internet, the
proliferation of smartphones and the inclination of employees to
plug their personal devices into workplace networks and cart
proprietary information around. Hackers’ preferred modus
operandi, security experts say, is to break into employees’
portable devices and leapfrog into employers’ networks —
stealing secrets while leaving nary a trace.
Targets of hack attacks are reluctant to discuss them and
statistics are scarce. Most breaches go unreported, security
experts say, because corporate victims fear what disclosure
might mean for their stock price, or because those affected
never knew they were hacked in the first place. But the scope of
the problem is illustrated by an incident at the United States
Chamber of Commerce in 2010.
The chamber did not learn that it — and its member organizations
— were the victims of a cybertheft that had lasted for months
until the Federal Bureau of Investigation told the group that
servers in China were stealing information from four of its Asia
policy experts, who frequent China. By the time the chamber
secured its network, hackers had pilfered at least six weeks
worth of e-mails with its member organizations, which include
most of the nation’s largest corporations. Later still, the
chamber discovered that its office printer and even a thermostat
in one of its corporate apartments were still communicating with
an Internet address in China.
The chamber did not disclose how hackers had infiltrated its
systems, but its first step after the attack was to bar
employees from taking devices with them “to certain countries,”
notably China, a spokesman said.
The implication, said Jacob Olcott, a cybersecurity expert at
Good Harbor Consulting, was that devices brought into China were
hacked. “Everybody knows that if you are doing business in
China, in the 21st century, you don’t bring anything with you.
That’s ‘Business 101’ — at least it should be.”
Neither the Chinese nor Russian embassies in Washington
responded to several requests for comment. But after Google
accused Chinese hackers of breaking into its systems in 2010,
Chinese officials gave this statement: “China is committed to
protecting the legitimate rights and interests of foreign
companies in our country.”
Still, United States security experts and government officials
say they are increasingly concerned about breaches from within
these countries into corporate networks — whether through mobile
devices or other means.
Last week, James R. Clapper, the director of national
intelligence, warned in testimony before the Senate Intelligence
Committee about theft of trade secrets by “entities” within
China and Russia. And Mike McConnell, a former director of
national intelligence, and now a private consultant, said in an
interview, “In looking at computer systems of consequence — in
government, Congress, at the Department of Defense, aerospace,
companies with valuable trade secrets — we’ve not examined one
yet that has not been infected by an advanced persistent
threat.”
Both China and Russia prohibit travelers from entering the
country with encrypted devices unless they have government
permission. When officials from those countries visit the United
States, they take extra precautions to prevent the hacking of
their portable devices, according to security experts.
Now, United States companies, government agencies and
organizations are doing the same by imposing do-not-carry rules.
Representative Mike Rogers, the Michigan Republican who is
chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said its members
could bring only “clean” devices to China and were forbidden
from connecting to the government’s network while abroad. As for
himself, he said he traveled “electronically naked.”
At the State Department, employees get specific instruction on
how to secure their devices in Russia and China, and are briefed
annually on general principles of security. At the Brookings
Institution, Mr. Lieberthal advises companies that do business
in China. He said that there was no formal policy mandating that
employees leave their devices at home, “but they certainly
educate employees who travel to China and Russia to do so.”
McAfee, the security company, said that if any employee’s device
was inspected at the Chinese border, it could never be plugged
into McAfee’s network again. Ever. “We just wouldn’t take the
risk,” said Simon Hunt, a vice president.
At AirPatrol, a company based in Columbia, Md., that specializes
in wireless security systems, employees take only loaner devices
to China and Russia, never enable Bluetooth and always switch
off the microphone and camera. “We operate under the assumption
that we will inevitably be compromised,” said Tom Kellermann,
the company’s chief technology officer and a member of President
Obama’s commission on cybersecurity.
Google said it would not comment on its internal travel
policies, but employees who spoke on condition of anonymity said
the company prohibited them from bringing sensitive data to
China, required they bring only loaner laptops or have their
devices inspected upon their return.
Federal lawmakers are considering bills aimed at thwarting
cybertheft of trade secrets, although it is unclear whether this
legislation would directly address problems that arise from
business trips overseas.
In the meantime, companies are leaking critical information,
often without realizing it.
“The Chinese are very good at covering their tracks,” said Scott
Aken, a former F.B.I. agent who specialized in
counterintelligence and computer intrusion. “In most cases,
companies don’t realize they’ve been burned until years later
when a foreign competitor puts out their very same product —
only they’re making it 30 percent cheaper.”
“We’ve already lost our manufacturing base,” he said. “Now we’re
losing our R.& D. base. If we lose that, what do we fall
back on?”
A version of this article appeared in print on February 11,
2012, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline:
Traveling Light in a Time of Digital Thievery.