Frank R Molver (4 Feb 2012)
"Ron re Jan 28, confirmations"

The problem that I see is not that you derived a certain date using various methods.
Many people have done that here many times.
The problem is that you have a habit of saying that you received confirmations.
As the letters and confirmations continued others started having them.
Now, many of us have done this before, it isn't the first time.
I like the fact that you show humility in not being dogmatic about these speculations.
And you do generate a lot of interesting debate.
Lets just be more careful about what you consider confirmations and word it a little bit differently.
We all make mistakes, I and many others.
An apology does not need excuses.
I made a mistake, that should be good enough.