Pineman, in his post here: http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/feb2012/pineman27.htm makes interesting points about what he considers the "non-sequitur" of Ron Reese, i.e. Obama is the 11th king. unfortunately, this take on it, though seemingly logical, is also faulty because it is based on the indefensible position that the North American Union is one of the 10. Today, the identity of the 10 is unknown. thus, one theory can't be used to debunk another theory. this is in no way a defense of Ron Reese's (and other's) position that Obama is the 11th king, the AC, which I do not agree with. at all.